Clinical education and training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality and capacity

P.L. Williams, N. White, R. Klem, S.E. Wilson, P. Bartholomew

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    There are a number of group-based research techniques available to determine the views or perceptions of individuals in relation to specific topics. This paper reports on one method, the nominal group technique (NGT) which was used to collect the views of important stakeholders on the factors affecting the quality of, and capacity to provide clinical education and training in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy and oncology departments in the UK. Inclusion criteria were devised to recruit learners, educators, practitioners and service managers to the nominal groups. Eight regional groups comprising a total of 92 individuals were enrolled; the numbers in each group varied between 9 and 13. A total of 131 items (factors) were generated across the groups (mean=16.4). Each group was then asked to select the top three factors from their original list. Consensus on the important factors amongst groups found that all eight groups agreed on one item: staff attitude, motivation and commitment to learners. The 131 items were organised into themes using content analysis. Five main categories and a number of subcategories emerged. The study concluded that the NGT provided data which were congruent with the issues faced by practitioners and learners in their daily work; this was of vital importance if the findings are to be regarded with credibility. Further advantages and limitations of the method are discussed, however it is argued that the NGT is a useful technique to gather relevant opinion; to select priorities and to reach consensus on a wide range of issues.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages215-224
    Number of pages10
    JournalRadiography
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2006

    Fingerprint

    Consensus
    Research Design
    Attitude of Health Personnel
    Education
    Diagnostic Imaging
    Motivation
    Radiotherapy

    Cite this

    @article{23de96dd8b6b487b91e1864f4b51e429,
    title = "Clinical education and training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality and capacity",
    abstract = "There are a number of group-based research techniques available to determine the views or perceptions of individuals in relation to specific topics. This paper reports on one method, the nominal group technique (NGT) which was used to collect the views of important stakeholders on the factors affecting the quality of, and capacity to provide clinical education and training in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy and oncology departments in the UK. Inclusion criteria were devised to recruit learners, educators, practitioners and service managers to the nominal groups. Eight regional groups comprising a total of 92 individuals were enrolled; the numbers in each group varied between 9 and 13. A total of 131 items (factors) were generated across the groups (mean=16.4). Each group was then asked to select the top three factors from their original list. Consensus on the important factors amongst groups found that all eight groups agreed on one item: staff attitude, motivation and commitment to learners. The 131 items were organised into themes using content analysis. Five main categories and a number of subcategories emerged. The study concluded that the NGT provided data which were congruent with the issues faced by practitioners and learners in their daily work; this was of vital importance if the findings are to be regarded with credibility. Further advantages and limitations of the method are discussed, however it is argued that the NGT is a useful technique to gather relevant opinion; to select priorities and to reach consensus on a wide range of issues.",
    author = "P.L. Williams and N. White and R. Klem and S.E. Wilson and P. Bartholomew",
    year = "2006",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/J.RADI.2005.06.001",
    language = "English",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "215--224",
    journal = "Radiography",
    issn = "1078-8174",
    number = "3",

    }

    Clinical education and training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality and capacity. / Williams, P.L.; White, N.; Klem, R.; Wilson, S.E.; Bartholomew, P.

    In: Radiography, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.08.2006, p. 215-224.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Clinical education and training: Using the nominal group technique in research with radiographers to identify factors affecting quality and capacity

    AU - Williams, P.L.

    AU - White, N.

    AU - Klem, R.

    AU - Wilson, S.E.

    AU - Bartholomew, P.

    PY - 2006/8/1

    Y1 - 2006/8/1

    N2 - There are a number of group-based research techniques available to determine the views or perceptions of individuals in relation to specific topics. This paper reports on one method, the nominal group technique (NGT) which was used to collect the views of important stakeholders on the factors affecting the quality of, and capacity to provide clinical education and training in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy and oncology departments in the UK. Inclusion criteria were devised to recruit learners, educators, practitioners and service managers to the nominal groups. Eight regional groups comprising a total of 92 individuals were enrolled; the numbers in each group varied between 9 and 13. A total of 131 items (factors) were generated across the groups (mean=16.4). Each group was then asked to select the top three factors from their original list. Consensus on the important factors amongst groups found that all eight groups agreed on one item: staff attitude, motivation and commitment to learners. The 131 items were organised into themes using content analysis. Five main categories and a number of subcategories emerged. The study concluded that the NGT provided data which were congruent with the issues faced by practitioners and learners in their daily work; this was of vital importance if the findings are to be regarded with credibility. Further advantages and limitations of the method are discussed, however it is argued that the NGT is a useful technique to gather relevant opinion; to select priorities and to reach consensus on a wide range of issues.

    AB - There are a number of group-based research techniques available to determine the views or perceptions of individuals in relation to specific topics. This paper reports on one method, the nominal group technique (NGT) which was used to collect the views of important stakeholders on the factors affecting the quality of, and capacity to provide clinical education and training in diagnostic imaging and radiotherapy and oncology departments in the UK. Inclusion criteria were devised to recruit learners, educators, practitioners and service managers to the nominal groups. Eight regional groups comprising a total of 92 individuals were enrolled; the numbers in each group varied between 9 and 13. A total of 131 items (factors) were generated across the groups (mean=16.4). Each group was then asked to select the top three factors from their original list. Consensus on the important factors amongst groups found that all eight groups agreed on one item: staff attitude, motivation and commitment to learners. The 131 items were organised into themes using content analysis. Five main categories and a number of subcategories emerged. The study concluded that the NGT provided data which were congruent with the issues faced by practitioners and learners in their daily work; this was of vital importance if the findings are to be regarded with credibility. Further advantages and limitations of the method are discussed, however it is argued that the NGT is a useful technique to gather relevant opinion; to select priorities and to reach consensus on a wide range of issues.

    U2 - 10.1016/J.RADI.2005.06.001

    DO - 10.1016/J.RADI.2005.06.001

    M3 - Article

    VL - 12

    SP - 215

    EP - 224

    JO - Radiography

    T2 - Radiography

    JF - Radiography

    SN - 1078-8174

    IS - 3

    ER -