Civil Society as Ideology in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective

Jessica Doyle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the early 1990s support for civil society has constituted the linchpin of international efforts in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) to promote democratisation and democratic values. The rationale for this support lies in an understanding of civil society drawn from a liberal-democratic model, which dominates debates about civil society. This paper highlights the inaccuracies of this model when applied to the MENA and, using Turkey as an example, draws attention to the perils of supporting civil society organisations (CSOs) based on its conjectures. A critical analysis of CSOs and their role in Turkish society, drawing on the theoretical framework laid down by Gramsci, highlights two key issues: (1) contrary to the dominant policy view which equates civil society organisations with democracy, CSOs often assist elites in both democratic and undemocratic states to extend and consolidate their political economic power; (2) the idealisation of civil society by Western policy makers results in a diminished awareness of the factors which weaken civil society and erodes its democratic potential. Overall, the findings support the assertion that CSOs in the MENA facilitate predominantly elite interests over those of ordinary citizens and democracy more broadly.
LanguageEnglish
Pages403-422
JournalBritish Journal of Middle Eastern Studies
Volume43
Issue number3
Early online date18 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Middle East
civil society
ideology
North Africa
East Africa
elite
democracy
economic power
political power
democratization
Turkey
citizen

Keywords

  • Civil society
  • CSOs
  • Democracy
  • Gramsci
  • Middle East
  • Turkey

Cite this

@article{be6b90c0e33a4f89857bb024aca3df9c,
title = "Civil Society as Ideology in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective",
abstract = "Since the early 1990s support for civil society has constituted the linchpin of international efforts in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) to promote democratisation and democratic values. The rationale for this support lies in an understanding of civil society drawn from a liberal-democratic model, which dominates debates about civil society. This paper highlights the inaccuracies of this model when applied to the MENA and, using Turkey as an example, draws attention to the perils of supporting civil society organisations (CSOs) based on its conjectures. A critical analysis of CSOs and their role in Turkish society, drawing on the theoretical framework laid down by Gramsci, highlights two key issues: (1) contrary to the dominant policy view which equates civil society organisations with democracy, CSOs often assist elites in both democratic and undemocratic states to extend and consolidate their political economic power; (2) the idealisation of civil society by Western policy makers results in a diminished awareness of the factors which weaken civil society and erodes its democratic potential. Overall, the findings support the assertion that CSOs in the MENA facilitate predominantly elite interests over those of ordinary citizens and democracy more broadly.",
keywords = "Civil society, CSOs, Democracy, Gramsci, Middle East, Turkey",
author = "Jessica Doyle",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/13530194.2015.1102713",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "403--422",
journal = "British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies",
issn = "1353-0194",
number = "3",

}

Civil Society as Ideology in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective. / Doyle, Jessica.

In: British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 43, No. 3, 30.09.2016, p. 403-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Civil Society as Ideology in the Middle East: A Critical Perspective

AU - Doyle, Jessica

PY - 2016/9/30

Y1 - 2016/9/30

N2 - Since the early 1990s support for civil society has constituted the linchpin of international efforts in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) to promote democratisation and democratic values. The rationale for this support lies in an understanding of civil society drawn from a liberal-democratic model, which dominates debates about civil society. This paper highlights the inaccuracies of this model when applied to the MENA and, using Turkey as an example, draws attention to the perils of supporting civil society organisations (CSOs) based on its conjectures. A critical analysis of CSOs and their role in Turkish society, drawing on the theoretical framework laid down by Gramsci, highlights two key issues: (1) contrary to the dominant policy view which equates civil society organisations with democracy, CSOs often assist elites in both democratic and undemocratic states to extend and consolidate their political economic power; (2) the idealisation of civil society by Western policy makers results in a diminished awareness of the factors which weaken civil society and erodes its democratic potential. Overall, the findings support the assertion that CSOs in the MENA facilitate predominantly elite interests over those of ordinary citizens and democracy more broadly.

AB - Since the early 1990s support for civil society has constituted the linchpin of international efforts in the Middle East North Africa (MENA) to promote democratisation and democratic values. The rationale for this support lies in an understanding of civil society drawn from a liberal-democratic model, which dominates debates about civil society. This paper highlights the inaccuracies of this model when applied to the MENA and, using Turkey as an example, draws attention to the perils of supporting civil society organisations (CSOs) based on its conjectures. A critical analysis of CSOs and their role in Turkish society, drawing on the theoretical framework laid down by Gramsci, highlights two key issues: (1) contrary to the dominant policy view which equates civil society organisations with democracy, CSOs often assist elites in both democratic and undemocratic states to extend and consolidate their political economic power; (2) the idealisation of civil society by Western policy makers results in a diminished awareness of the factors which weaken civil society and erodes its democratic potential. Overall, the findings support the assertion that CSOs in the MENA facilitate predominantly elite interests over those of ordinary citizens and democracy more broadly.

KW - Civil society

KW - CSOs

KW - Democracy

KW - Gramsci

KW - Middle East

KW - Turkey

UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/civil-society-as-ideology-in-the-middle-east-a-critical-perspecti-3

U2 - 10.1080/13530194.2015.1102713

DO - 10.1080/13530194.2015.1102713

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 403

EP - 422

JO - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

T2 - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

JF - British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies

SN - 1353-0194

IS - 3

ER -