Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper reports on a collaborative exercise designed to generate a coherent agenda for research on mathematical cognition. Following anestablished method, the exercise brought together 16 mathematical cognition researchers from across the fields of mathematics education,psychology and neuroscience. These participants engaged in a process in which they generated an initial list of research questions with thepotential to significantly advance understanding of mathematical cognition, winnowed this list to a smaller set of priority questions, and refinedthe eventual questions to meet criteria related to clarity, specificity and practicability. The resulting list comprises 26 questions divided into sixbroad topic areas: elucidating the nature of mathematical thinking, mapping predictors and processes of competence development, chartingdevelopmental trajectories and their interactions, fostering conceptual understanding and procedural skill, designing effective interventions,and developing valid and reliable measures. In presenting these questions in this paper, we intend to support greater coherence in bothinvestigation and reporting, to build a stronger base of information for consideration by policymakers, and to encourage researchers to takea consilient approach to addressing important challenges in mathematical cognition.
LanguageEnglish
Pages20-41
JournalJournal of Numerical Cognition
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

cognition
neurosciences
psychology
mathematics
interaction
education

Keywords

  • mathematics
  • cognition
  • education
  • psychology

Cite this

@article{22a4e6fbe93b4d548fbc0c1ad326a6a4,
title = "Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda",
abstract = "This paper reports on a collaborative exercise designed to generate a coherent agenda for research on mathematical cognition. Following anestablished method, the exercise brought together 16 mathematical cognition researchers from across the fields of mathematics education,psychology and neuroscience. These participants engaged in a process in which they generated an initial list of research questions with thepotential to significantly advance understanding of mathematical cognition, winnowed this list to a smaller set of priority questions, and refinedthe eventual questions to meet criteria related to clarity, specificity and practicability. The resulting list comprises 26 questions divided into sixbroad topic areas: elucidating the nature of mathematical thinking, mapping predictors and processes of competence development, chartingdevelopmental trajectories and their interactions, fostering conceptual understanding and procedural skill, designing effective interventions,and developing valid and reliable measures. In presenting these questions in this paper, we intend to support greater coherence in bothinvestigation and reporting, to build a stronger base of information for consideration by policymakers, and to encourage researchers to takea consilient approach to addressing important challenges in mathematical cognition.",
keywords = "mathematics, cognition, education, psychology",
author = "Victoria Simms",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5964/jnc.v2i1.10",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "20--41",
journal = "Journal of Numerical Cognition",
issn = "2363-8761",
number = "1",

}

Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda. / Simms, Victoria.

In: Journal of Numerical Cognition, Vol. 2, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 20-41.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Challenges in Mathematical Cognition: A Collaboratively-Derived Research Agenda

AU - Simms, Victoria

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - This paper reports on a collaborative exercise designed to generate a coherent agenda for research on mathematical cognition. Following anestablished method, the exercise brought together 16 mathematical cognition researchers from across the fields of mathematics education,psychology and neuroscience. These participants engaged in a process in which they generated an initial list of research questions with thepotential to significantly advance understanding of mathematical cognition, winnowed this list to a smaller set of priority questions, and refinedthe eventual questions to meet criteria related to clarity, specificity and practicability. The resulting list comprises 26 questions divided into sixbroad topic areas: elucidating the nature of mathematical thinking, mapping predictors and processes of competence development, chartingdevelopmental trajectories and their interactions, fostering conceptual understanding and procedural skill, designing effective interventions,and developing valid and reliable measures. In presenting these questions in this paper, we intend to support greater coherence in bothinvestigation and reporting, to build a stronger base of information for consideration by policymakers, and to encourage researchers to takea consilient approach to addressing important challenges in mathematical cognition.

AB - This paper reports on a collaborative exercise designed to generate a coherent agenda for research on mathematical cognition. Following anestablished method, the exercise brought together 16 mathematical cognition researchers from across the fields of mathematics education,psychology and neuroscience. These participants engaged in a process in which they generated an initial list of research questions with thepotential to significantly advance understanding of mathematical cognition, winnowed this list to a smaller set of priority questions, and refinedthe eventual questions to meet criteria related to clarity, specificity and practicability. The resulting list comprises 26 questions divided into sixbroad topic areas: elucidating the nature of mathematical thinking, mapping predictors and processes of competence development, chartingdevelopmental trajectories and their interactions, fostering conceptual understanding and procedural skill, designing effective interventions,and developing valid and reliable measures. In presenting these questions in this paper, we intend to support greater coherence in bothinvestigation and reporting, to build a stronger base of information for consideration by policymakers, and to encourage researchers to takea consilient approach to addressing important challenges in mathematical cognition.

KW - mathematics

KW - cognition

KW - education

KW - psychology

U2 - 10.5964/jnc.v2i1.10

DO - 10.5964/jnc.v2i1.10

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 20

EP - 41

JO - Journal of Numerical Cognition

T2 - Journal of Numerical Cognition

JF - Journal of Numerical Cognition

SN - 2363-8761

IS - 1

ER -