Abstract
Objective - To assess whether the quality of x ray films transmitted via a low cost (low resolution) telemedicine link was satisfactory for clinical diagnosis. Methods - A retrospective study of a set of consecutive accident and emergency (A&E) radiographs. An A&E registrar viewed these directly on a standard x ray viewing box and via a telemedicine link. Results - There were 81 abnormalities out of 234 x ray films. Three abnormalities were missed both on the x ray viewing box and telemedicine link, one of which was significant. There were five additional abnormalities missed on the telemedicine link but detected on the x ray viewing box, of which two were significant. One normal x ray film was interpreted as abnormal on the telemedicine link. There were no false positives on direct viewing. Conclusion - Transference of plain radiographs using a low cost/low resolution telemedicine link by A&E doctors is adequate for clinical interpretation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 312-314 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Journal of Accident & Emergency Medicine |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Sept 1998 |
Keywords
- Telemedicine
- X ray films
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Can x rays be accurately interpreted using a low cost telemedicine system?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver