Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict

C Penny Tridimas, George Tridimas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to use the insights of collective choice theory to examine the format and outcome of the Brexit Referendum. It is argued first that the question asked by the Referendum was incomplete for it failed to address the choice between “Hard” and “Soft” Brexit resulting in a legitimacy deficiency. Second, this observation gives rise to the question of the actor who can remedy the deficiency, either the electorate in an additional referendum on the form of Brexit, or Parliament in an active role in negotiations.
LanguageEnglish
Pages87-104
Number of pages7
JournalKing's Student Journal for Politics, Philosophy and Law
Volume1
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 15 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

referendum
parliament
remedies
legitimacy

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • Referendum
  • EU
  • first-past-the-post electoral rule

Cite this

Tridimas, C. P., & Tridimas, G. (Accepted/In press). Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict. 1, 87-104.
Tridimas, C Penny ; Tridimas, George. / Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict. 2017 ; Vol. 1. pp. 87-104.
@article{8e36fc2a6da044b2b7d059296b83ef12,
title = "Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to use the insights of collective choice theory to examine the format and outcome of the Brexit Referendum. It is argued first that the question asked by the Referendum was incomplete for it failed to address the choice between “Hard” and “Soft” Brexit resulting in a legitimacy deficiency. Second, this observation gives rise to the question of the actor who can remedy the deficiency, either the electorate in an additional referendum on the form of Brexit, or Parliament in an active role in negotiations.",
keywords = "Brexit, Referendum, EU, first-past-the-post electoral rule",
author = "Tridimas, {C Penny} and George Tridimas",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "15",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "87--104",

}

Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict. / Tridimas, C Penny; Tridimas, George.

Vol. 1, 15.01.2017, p. 87-104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Brexit Referendum: An Incomplete Electoral Verdict

AU - Tridimas, C Penny

AU - Tridimas, George

PY - 2017/1/15

Y1 - 2017/1/15

N2 - The purpose of this paper is to use the insights of collective choice theory to examine the format and outcome of the Brexit Referendum. It is argued first that the question asked by the Referendum was incomplete for it failed to address the choice between “Hard” and “Soft” Brexit resulting in a legitimacy deficiency. Second, this observation gives rise to the question of the actor who can remedy the deficiency, either the electorate in an additional referendum on the form of Brexit, or Parliament in an active role in negotiations.

AB - The purpose of this paper is to use the insights of collective choice theory to examine the format and outcome of the Brexit Referendum. It is argued first that the question asked by the Referendum was incomplete for it failed to address the choice between “Hard” and “Soft” Brexit resulting in a legitimacy deficiency. Second, this observation gives rise to the question of the actor who can remedy the deficiency, either the electorate in an additional referendum on the form of Brexit, or Parliament in an active role in negotiations.

KW - Brexit

KW - Referendum

KW - EU

KW - first-past-the-post electoral rule

M3 - Article

VL - 1

SP - 87

EP - 104

ER -