Body size distributions in North American freshwater fish: large-scale factors

David Griffiths

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    18 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aim To document continental- and regional-scale variation in the size distributionsof freshwater fish and examine some energetic, evolutionary and biogeographicexplanations for these patterns.Location North America.Methods Regional species lists, coupled with habitat and body size information,were used to document the spatial patterns.Results At the continental scale, riverine specialist fishes show a unimodal, rightskewed,body size distribution whereas habitat generalist and lacustrine specialistspecies exhibit bimodal size distributions, with only a slight preponderance ofsmall-mode species. Most large-mode species are migratory. Resident species,unlike migratory ones, show a latitudinal increase in mean size, but the size increaseacross all species is steeper because the importance of large migratory speciesincreases with latitude. Size distributions change from right- to left-skewed withincreasing latitude. Maximum body size does not change with increasing familyrichness but minimum size declines and skewness increases, consistent with diversificationof small species. Skewness does not vary with mean family body size.Main conclusions Post-glacial recolonization by large, habitat generalist, migratoryspecies is the main determinant of latitudinal size distribution trends. There islittle support for the energetic hypothesis, but the data are consistent with a negativeCope’s rule.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages383-392
    JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
    Volume21
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint

    freshwater fish
    body size
    migratory species
    skewness
    fish
    generalist
    habitat
    energetics
    habitats
    recolonization
    Postglacial
    document
    methodology

    Cite this

    @article{c4f0c62e39674e27b6750f50a45665b3,
    title = "Body size distributions in North American freshwater fish: large-scale factors",
    abstract = "Aim To document continental- and regional-scale variation in the size distributionsof freshwater fish and examine some energetic, evolutionary and biogeographicexplanations for these patterns.Location North America.Methods Regional species lists, coupled with habitat and body size information,were used to document the spatial patterns.Results At the continental scale, riverine specialist fishes show a unimodal, rightskewed,body size distribution whereas habitat generalist and lacustrine specialistspecies exhibit bimodal size distributions, with only a slight preponderance ofsmall-mode species. Most large-mode species are migratory. Resident species,unlike migratory ones, show a latitudinal increase in mean size, but the size increaseacross all species is steeper because the importance of large migratory speciesincreases with latitude. Size distributions change from right- to left-skewed withincreasing latitude. Maximum body size does not change with increasing familyrichness but minimum size declines and skewness increases, consistent with diversificationof small species. Skewness does not vary with mean family body size.Main conclusions Post-glacial recolonization by large, habitat generalist, migratoryspecies is the main determinant of latitudinal size distribution trends. There islittle support for the energetic hypothesis, but the data are consistent with a negativeCope’s rule.",
    author = "David Griffiths",
    year = "2012",
    doi = "10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00680.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "21",
    pages = "383--392",
    journal = "Global Ecology and Biogeography",
    issn = "1466-822X",

    }

    Body size distributions in North American freshwater fish: large-scale factors. / Griffiths, David.

    In: Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 21, 2012, p. 383-392.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Body size distributions in North American freshwater fish: large-scale factors

    AU - Griffiths, David

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - Aim To document continental- and regional-scale variation in the size distributionsof freshwater fish and examine some energetic, evolutionary and biogeographicexplanations for these patterns.Location North America.Methods Regional species lists, coupled with habitat and body size information,were used to document the spatial patterns.Results At the continental scale, riverine specialist fishes show a unimodal, rightskewed,body size distribution whereas habitat generalist and lacustrine specialistspecies exhibit bimodal size distributions, with only a slight preponderance ofsmall-mode species. Most large-mode species are migratory. Resident species,unlike migratory ones, show a latitudinal increase in mean size, but the size increaseacross all species is steeper because the importance of large migratory speciesincreases with latitude. Size distributions change from right- to left-skewed withincreasing latitude. Maximum body size does not change with increasing familyrichness but minimum size declines and skewness increases, consistent with diversificationof small species. Skewness does not vary with mean family body size.Main conclusions Post-glacial recolonization by large, habitat generalist, migratoryspecies is the main determinant of latitudinal size distribution trends. There islittle support for the energetic hypothesis, but the data are consistent with a negativeCope’s rule.

    AB - Aim To document continental- and regional-scale variation in the size distributionsof freshwater fish and examine some energetic, evolutionary and biogeographicexplanations for these patterns.Location North America.Methods Regional species lists, coupled with habitat and body size information,were used to document the spatial patterns.Results At the continental scale, riverine specialist fishes show a unimodal, rightskewed,body size distribution whereas habitat generalist and lacustrine specialistspecies exhibit bimodal size distributions, with only a slight preponderance ofsmall-mode species. Most large-mode species are migratory. Resident species,unlike migratory ones, show a latitudinal increase in mean size, but the size increaseacross all species is steeper because the importance of large migratory speciesincreases with latitude. Size distributions change from right- to left-skewed withincreasing latitude. Maximum body size does not change with increasing familyrichness but minimum size declines and skewness increases, consistent with diversificationof small species. Skewness does not vary with mean family body size.Main conclusions Post-glacial recolonization by large, habitat generalist, migratoryspecies is the main determinant of latitudinal size distribution trends. There islittle support for the energetic hypothesis, but the data are consistent with a negativeCope’s rule.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00680.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00680.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 21

    SP - 383

    EP - 392

    JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography

    T2 - Global Ecology and Biogeography

    JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography

    SN - 1466-822X

    ER -