Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Please note that the original article is published in the International Journal of Law in ContextThis article seeks to address a specific aspect of Bills of Rights that tends to be neglected in the literature. That is, the process of how Bills of Rights are drafted. In particular it focuses on the drafting of a particular right-equality with a view to identifying if there is a link between: (a) the manner of how an equality provision is drafted and securing legitimacy of the final product; (b) whether a participative process can influence the formulation and articulation of an equality provision; and finally (c) if the ‘people’ have spoken through this document, does this encourage the judges to take a less restrictive approach in interpreting the equality provision? This task is undertaken by drawing upon the Canadian experience, which then will be used to draw out lessons for those jurisdictions where the process of drafting an equality provision in a Bill of Rights is under way. The article is supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key players involved in the drafting and interpretation of the equality provision in the Canadian Charter.
LanguageEnglish
Pages343-372
JournalInternational Journal of Law in Context
Volume3
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

equality
experience
charter
bill
jurisdiction
legitimacy
interpretation
Law
interview

Keywords

  • Bills of Rights
  • process
  • equality
  • participative democracy
  • public participation
  • Canada

Cite this

@article{a165ac29239741bd8aefa5c0af38a146,
title = "Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience",
abstract = "Please note that the original article is published in the International Journal of Law in ContextThis article seeks to address a specific aspect of Bills of Rights that tends to be neglected in the literature. That is, the process of how Bills of Rights are drafted. In particular it focuses on the drafting of a particular right-equality with a view to identifying if there is a link between: (a) the manner of how an equality provision is drafted and securing legitimacy of the final product; (b) whether a participative process can influence the formulation and articulation of an equality provision; and finally (c) if the ‘people’ have spoken through this document, does this encourage the judges to take a less restrictive approach in interpreting the equality provision? This task is undertaken by drawing upon the Canadian experience, which then will be used to draw out lessons for those jurisdictions where the process of drafting an equality provision in a Bill of Rights is under way. The article is supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key players involved in the drafting and interpretation of the equality provision in the Canadian Charter.",
keywords = "Bills of Rights, process, equality, participative democracy, public participation, Canada",
author = "Anne Smith",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "343--372",
journal = "International Journal of Law in Context",
issn = "1744-5523",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience. / Smith, Anne.

In: International Journal of Law in Context, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2008, p. 343-372.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bills of Rights as process: the Canadian experience

AU - Smith, Anne

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Please note that the original article is published in the International Journal of Law in ContextThis article seeks to address a specific aspect of Bills of Rights that tends to be neglected in the literature. That is, the process of how Bills of Rights are drafted. In particular it focuses on the drafting of a particular right-equality with a view to identifying if there is a link between: (a) the manner of how an equality provision is drafted and securing legitimacy of the final product; (b) whether a participative process can influence the formulation and articulation of an equality provision; and finally (c) if the ‘people’ have spoken through this document, does this encourage the judges to take a less restrictive approach in interpreting the equality provision? This task is undertaken by drawing upon the Canadian experience, which then will be used to draw out lessons for those jurisdictions where the process of drafting an equality provision in a Bill of Rights is under way. The article is supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key players involved in the drafting and interpretation of the equality provision in the Canadian Charter.

AB - Please note that the original article is published in the International Journal of Law in ContextThis article seeks to address a specific aspect of Bills of Rights that tends to be neglected in the literature. That is, the process of how Bills of Rights are drafted. In particular it focuses on the drafting of a particular right-equality with a view to identifying if there is a link between: (a) the manner of how an equality provision is drafted and securing legitimacy of the final product; (b) whether a participative process can influence the formulation and articulation of an equality provision; and finally (c) if the ‘people’ have spoken through this document, does this encourage the judges to take a less restrictive approach in interpreting the equality provision? This task is undertaken by drawing upon the Canadian experience, which then will be used to draw out lessons for those jurisdictions where the process of drafting an equality provision in a Bill of Rights is under way. The article is supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key players involved in the drafting and interpretation of the equality provision in the Canadian Charter.

KW - Bills of Rights

KW - process

KW - equality

KW - participative democracy

KW - public participation

KW - Canada

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 343

EP - 372

JO - International Journal of Law in Context

T2 - International Journal of Law in Context

JF - International Journal of Law in Context

SN - 1744-5523

IS - 4

ER -