Best practice in high-frequency water quality monitoring for improved management and assessment; a novel decision workflow

  • J. Rozemeijer
  • , P. Jordan
  • , A. Hooijboer
  • , B. Kronvang
  • , M. Glendell
  • , R. Hensley
  • , K. Rinke
  • , M. Stutter
  • , M. Bieroza
  • , R. Turner
  • , P. E. Mellander
  • , P. Thorburn
  • , R. Cassidy
  • , J. Appels
  • , K. Ouwerkerk
  • , M. Rode

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

126 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The use of high-frequency water quality monitoring has increased over several decades. This has mostly been motivated by curiosity-driven research and has significantly improved our understanding of hydrochemical processes. Despite these scientific successes and the growth in sensor technology, the large-scale uptake of high-frequency water quality monitoring by water managers is hampered by a lack of comprehensive practical guidelines. Low-frequency hydrochemical data are still routinely used to review environmental policies but are prone to missing important event-driven processes. With a changing climate where such event-driven processes are more likely to occur and have a greater impact, the adoption of high-frequency water quality monitoring is becoming more pressing. To prepare regulators and environmental and hydrological agencies for these new challenges, this paper reviews international best practice in high-frequency data provision. As a result, we summarise the added value of high-frequency water quality monitoring, describe international best practices for sensors and analysers in the field, and evaluate the experience with high-frequency data cleaning. We propose a decision workflow that includes considerations of monitoring data needs, sensor choice, maintenance and calibration, and structured data processing. The workflow fills an important knowledge-exchange gap between research and statutory surveillance for future high-frequency water quality sensor uptake by practitioners and agencies.
Original languageEnglish
Article number353
Pages (from-to)1-23
Number of pages23
JournalEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment
Volume197
Issue number4
Early online date4 Mar 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 4 Mar 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Data Access Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. The work of J. Rozemeijer, K. Ouwerkerk, and J. Appels was funded by Topconsortium for Knowledge and Innovation Watertechnology. M. Glendell and M. Stutter were funded by the Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government Strategic Research Programme 2022\u201327. This study received financial support from the EU Horizon Nordbalt-EcoSafe grant no. 1010600020. Open Access funding enabled by Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ.

Funder number
1010600020

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
      SDG 14 Life Below Water

    Keywords

    • Water quality
    • High-frequency data
    • Sensors
    • Monitoring
    • Decision workflow
    • Environmental Monitoring/methods
    • Water Pollutants, Chemical/analysis
    • Workflow
    • Water Quality
    • Environmental Monitoring - methods
    • Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Best practice in high-frequency water quality monitoring for improved management and assessment; a novel decision workflow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this