Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature

Hugh McKenna, Susan Ashton, Sinead Keeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

People with health problems deserve a service that is based on best available evidence and is possible within obtainable resources. No credible health professional could deny that sound evidence should be an integral part of clinical decision making. The demand for up to date information to inform care and treatment highlights the crucial role of research and development in the modern health service. However, within primary care, practitioners have not always been able to underpin their actions with robust research findings. In addition, the research activities within primary care are limited to a small number of 'enthusiasts'. This paper aims to analyse the literature surrounding this area, highlighting the significance of United Kingdom (UK) government reports on primary care, primary care research activities and the pursuit of evidence based practice in primary care. It shows that primary care research has been the 'poor relation' in terms of research funding and this has resulted is a dearth of high quality research results to underpin practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages369-378
JournalInternational Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Primary Health Care
Research
Health
Health Services

Cite this

McKenna, Hugh ; Ashton, Susan ; Keeney, Sinead. / Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature. 2004 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 369-378.
@article{9ddc182e387f45eab3586f073c9fac02,
title = "Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature",
abstract = "People with health problems deserve a service that is based on best available evidence and is possible within obtainable resources. No credible health professional could deny that sound evidence should be an integral part of clinical decision making. The demand for up to date information to inform care and treatment highlights the crucial role of research and development in the modern health service. However, within primary care, practitioners have not always been able to underpin their actions with robust research findings. In addition, the research activities within primary care are limited to a small number of 'enthusiasts'. This paper aims to analyse the literature surrounding this area, highlighting the significance of United Kingdom (UK) government reports on primary care, primary care research activities and the pursuit of evidence based practice in primary care. It shows that primary care research has been the 'poor relation' in terms of research funding and this has resulted is a dearth of high quality research results to underpin practice.",
author = "Hugh McKenna and Susan Ashton and Sinead Keeney",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.008",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "369--378",
number = "4",

}

Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature. / McKenna, Hugh; Ashton, Susan; Keeney, Sinead.

Vol. 41, No. 4, 2004, p. 369-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Barriers to evidence based practice in primary care: a review of the literature

AU - McKenna, Hugh

AU - Ashton, Susan

AU - Keeney, Sinead

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - People with health problems deserve a service that is based on best available evidence and is possible within obtainable resources. No credible health professional could deny that sound evidence should be an integral part of clinical decision making. The demand for up to date information to inform care and treatment highlights the crucial role of research and development in the modern health service. However, within primary care, practitioners have not always been able to underpin their actions with robust research findings. In addition, the research activities within primary care are limited to a small number of 'enthusiasts'. This paper aims to analyse the literature surrounding this area, highlighting the significance of United Kingdom (UK) government reports on primary care, primary care research activities and the pursuit of evidence based practice in primary care. It shows that primary care research has been the 'poor relation' in terms of research funding and this has resulted is a dearth of high quality research results to underpin practice.

AB - People with health problems deserve a service that is based on best available evidence and is possible within obtainable resources. No credible health professional could deny that sound evidence should be an integral part of clinical decision making. The demand for up to date information to inform care and treatment highlights the crucial role of research and development in the modern health service. However, within primary care, practitioners have not always been able to underpin their actions with robust research findings. In addition, the research activities within primary care are limited to a small number of 'enthusiasts'. This paper aims to analyse the literature surrounding this area, highlighting the significance of United Kingdom (UK) government reports on primary care, primary care research activities and the pursuit of evidence based practice in primary care. It shows that primary care research has been the 'poor relation' in terms of research funding and this has resulted is a dearth of high quality research results to underpin practice.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.008

DO - 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2003.10.008

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 369

EP - 378

IS - 4

ER -