Bad beach management: European perspectives

Andrew Cooper, G Anfuso, L Del Rio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 100,000-km-long coastline of Europe has a long history of human occupationand intervention in coastal processes. Rapid coastal development that began inthe 1960s, however, has accelerated during the past decade with increased humanmobility and affl uence. This has had disastrous consequences for the European beachresource. Through a series of examples in the UK, Spain, and Italy, we show thatpoorly sited infrastructure is the primary reason for beach erosion problems, andthat decision-making in the area of beach management suffers inherent weaknesses;current practice concentrates on the symptoms (through coastal defense or nourishment)but has been unable to address the root cause (ill-planned development).Consequently, society has become locked into an open-ended series of ameliorativemeasures that, in turn, fuel ongoing development by removing the element of fi nancialrisk from coastal development. The scale of contemporary development on theEuropean coast means that the beach erosion problem will become more acute withtime, even without the anticipated large-scale coastal morphological adjustment tosea-level rise. Storms, tsunamis, and a reduction in sediment supply mean that existingcoastal infrastructure poses a long-term fi nancial liability. Eventually, the costsinvolved in continued defense may precipitate changes in public policy. There areindications of this happening, but in the meantime, development increases apace, notjust in Europe, but on adjacent Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, to satisfy amainly European demand.
LanguageEnglish
Pages167-179
JournalGeological Society of America Special Paper
Volume460
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

beach erosion
coastal development
beach
coast
infrastructure
coastal protection
liability
tsunami
decision making
history
sediment
Europe
policy
Black Sea
demand
public
defence
society
Mediterranean Sea

Cite this

@article{3c80ed22941d4f318cf8351c3b66ab03,
title = "Bad beach management: European perspectives",
abstract = "The 100,000-km-long coastline of Europe has a long history of human occupationand intervention in coastal processes. Rapid coastal development that began inthe 1960s, however, has accelerated during the past decade with increased humanmobility and affl uence. This has had disastrous consequences for the European beachresource. Through a series of examples in the UK, Spain, and Italy, we show thatpoorly sited infrastructure is the primary reason for beach erosion problems, andthat decision-making in the area of beach management suffers inherent weaknesses;current practice concentrates on the symptoms (through coastal defense or nourishment)but has been unable to address the root cause (ill-planned development).Consequently, society has become locked into an open-ended series of ameliorativemeasures that, in turn, fuel ongoing development by removing the element of fi nancialrisk from coastal development. The scale of contemporary development on theEuropean coast means that the beach erosion problem will become more acute withtime, even without the anticipated large-scale coastal morphological adjustment tosea-level rise. Storms, tsunamis, and a reduction in sediment supply mean that existingcoastal infrastructure poses a long-term fi nancial liability. Eventually, the costsinvolved in continued defense may precipitate changes in public policy. There areindications of this happening, but in the meantime, development increases apace, notjust in Europe, but on adjacent Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, to satisfy amainly European demand.",
author = "Andrew Cooper and G Anfuso and {Del Rio}, L",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "460",
pages = "167--179",
journal = "Geological Society of America Bulletin",
issn = "0016-7606",

}

Bad beach management: European perspectives. / Cooper, Andrew; Anfuso, G; Del Rio, L.

In: Geological Society of America Special Paper, Vol. 460, 12.2009, p. 167-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Bad beach management: European perspectives

AU - Cooper, Andrew

AU - Anfuso, G

AU - Del Rio, L

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - The 100,000-km-long coastline of Europe has a long history of human occupationand intervention in coastal processes. Rapid coastal development that began inthe 1960s, however, has accelerated during the past decade with increased humanmobility and affl uence. This has had disastrous consequences for the European beachresource. Through a series of examples in the UK, Spain, and Italy, we show thatpoorly sited infrastructure is the primary reason for beach erosion problems, andthat decision-making in the area of beach management suffers inherent weaknesses;current practice concentrates on the symptoms (through coastal defense or nourishment)but has been unable to address the root cause (ill-planned development).Consequently, society has become locked into an open-ended series of ameliorativemeasures that, in turn, fuel ongoing development by removing the element of fi nancialrisk from coastal development. The scale of contemporary development on theEuropean coast means that the beach erosion problem will become more acute withtime, even without the anticipated large-scale coastal morphological adjustment tosea-level rise. Storms, tsunamis, and a reduction in sediment supply mean that existingcoastal infrastructure poses a long-term fi nancial liability. Eventually, the costsinvolved in continued defense may precipitate changes in public policy. There areindications of this happening, but in the meantime, development increases apace, notjust in Europe, but on adjacent Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, to satisfy amainly European demand.

AB - The 100,000-km-long coastline of Europe has a long history of human occupationand intervention in coastal processes. Rapid coastal development that began inthe 1960s, however, has accelerated during the past decade with increased humanmobility and affl uence. This has had disastrous consequences for the European beachresource. Through a series of examples in the UK, Spain, and Italy, we show thatpoorly sited infrastructure is the primary reason for beach erosion problems, andthat decision-making in the area of beach management suffers inherent weaknesses;current practice concentrates on the symptoms (through coastal defense or nourishment)but has been unable to address the root cause (ill-planned development).Consequently, society has become locked into an open-ended series of ameliorativemeasures that, in turn, fuel ongoing development by removing the element of fi nancialrisk from coastal development. The scale of contemporary development on theEuropean coast means that the beach erosion problem will become more acute withtime, even without the anticipated large-scale coastal morphological adjustment tosea-level rise. Storms, tsunamis, and a reduction in sediment supply mean that existingcoastal infrastructure poses a long-term fi nancial liability. Eventually, the costsinvolved in continued defense may precipitate changes in public policy. There areindications of this happening, but in the meantime, development increases apace, notjust in Europe, but on adjacent Mediterranean and Black Sea coasts, to satisfy amainly European demand.

M3 - Article

VL - 460

SP - 167

EP - 179

JO - Geological Society of America Bulletin

T2 - Geological Society of America Bulletin

JF - Geological Society of America Bulletin

SN - 0016-7606

ER -