Abstract
Questions about human behavior and diversity have captured the attention of scientists from a wide range of philosophical stances for centuries. While behavior analysts would argue that natural science is an enlightening perspective when applied to the understanding of the human condition, at times arguments within certain campaigns would prefer Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) to be banned or abolished. In this paper we discuss some of the roots of this stance and suggest a way forward based on what are basically complementary views on the goals enshrined in rights-based practice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 199-208 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 8 Apr 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 8 Apr 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2022 Published by KURA Education & Publishing.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Natural Science
- Behavior Analysis
- Human Diversity
- Autism
- Diversity
- Discrimination
- Autism Diversity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Autism and Behavior Analysis: From Dissonance to Dialogue'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Research output
- 1 Article
-
Advocacy and Open Science in the UK: Case Studies in the Autism Wars
Keenan, M. & Dillenburger, K. D., 28 Nov 2023, (Published online) In: Behavior Analysis In Practice.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile40 Downloads (Pure)
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver