Assumptions of Rationality in Political Marketing: The Case of the Republican Autopsy

Neil Bendle, June Cotte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There exists considerable controversy over what voter rationality assumptions underlie political marketing. Some of this controversy derives from the lack of clear definitions of rationality. An examination of seven common assumptions that underlie the concept of rationality shows that only a modest level of information, freedom from errors, and consistency are necessary for the marketing concept to have value in politics. The authors examine the implicit assumptions regarding voter rationality of the experienced Republican political campaign managers who wrote the Growth and Opportunity Project (“The Republican Autopsy”); their assumptions of voter rationality are consistent with those in the theoretical review. We find they appreciate the value of correctly tailoring messages and do not subscribe to a belief that political markets are efficient. We suggest that greater clarity about the various meanings of rationality should better allow marketing theorists to embrace ideas from disparate disciplines.
LanguageEnglish
Pages66-83
JournalJournal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

Political marketing
Rationality
Vote
Political campaigns
Freedom of information
Marketing
Tailoring
Marketing concept
Managers

Keywords

  • Bounded rationality
  • marketing concept
  • political marketing
  • rationality
  • voter decision-making

Cite this

@article{80b435f3cf904e9eaefcc23c6eed9249,
title = "Assumptions of Rationality in Political Marketing: The Case of the Republican Autopsy",
abstract = "There exists considerable controversy over what voter rationality assumptions underlie political marketing. Some of this controversy derives from the lack of clear definitions of rationality. An examination of seven common assumptions that underlie the concept of rationality shows that only a modest level of information, freedom from errors, and consistency are necessary for the marketing concept to have value in politics. The authors examine the implicit assumptions regarding voter rationality of the experienced Republican political campaign managers who wrote the Growth and Opportunity Project (“The Republican Autopsy”); their assumptions of voter rationality are consistent with those in the theoretical review. We find they appreciate the value of correctly tailoring messages and do not subscribe to a belief that political markets are efficient. We suggest that greater clarity about the various meanings of rationality should better allow marketing theorists to embrace ideas from disparate disciplines.",
keywords = "Bounded rationality, marketing concept, political marketing, rationality, voter decision-making",
author = "Neil Bendle and June Cotte",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10495142.2016.1131481",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "66--83",
journal = "Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing",
issn = "1049-5142",
number = "1",

}

Assumptions of Rationality in Political Marketing: The Case of the Republican Autopsy. / Bendle, Neil; Cotte, June.

In: Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, Vol. 28, No. 1, 02.03.2016, p. 66-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assumptions of Rationality in Political Marketing: The Case of the Republican Autopsy

AU - Bendle, Neil

AU - Cotte, June

PY - 2016/3/2

Y1 - 2016/3/2

N2 - There exists considerable controversy over what voter rationality assumptions underlie political marketing. Some of this controversy derives from the lack of clear definitions of rationality. An examination of seven common assumptions that underlie the concept of rationality shows that only a modest level of information, freedom from errors, and consistency are necessary for the marketing concept to have value in politics. The authors examine the implicit assumptions regarding voter rationality of the experienced Republican political campaign managers who wrote the Growth and Opportunity Project (“The Republican Autopsy”); their assumptions of voter rationality are consistent with those in the theoretical review. We find they appreciate the value of correctly tailoring messages and do not subscribe to a belief that political markets are efficient. We suggest that greater clarity about the various meanings of rationality should better allow marketing theorists to embrace ideas from disparate disciplines.

AB - There exists considerable controversy over what voter rationality assumptions underlie political marketing. Some of this controversy derives from the lack of clear definitions of rationality. An examination of seven common assumptions that underlie the concept of rationality shows that only a modest level of information, freedom from errors, and consistency are necessary for the marketing concept to have value in politics. The authors examine the implicit assumptions regarding voter rationality of the experienced Republican political campaign managers who wrote the Growth and Opportunity Project (“The Republican Autopsy”); their assumptions of voter rationality are consistent with those in the theoretical review. We find they appreciate the value of correctly tailoring messages and do not subscribe to a belief that political markets are efficient. We suggest that greater clarity about the various meanings of rationality should better allow marketing theorists to embrace ideas from disparate disciplines.

KW - Bounded rationality

KW - marketing concept

KW - political marketing

KW - rationality

KW - voter decision-making

U2 - 10.1080/10495142.2016.1131481

DO - 10.1080/10495142.2016.1131481

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 66

EP - 83

JO - Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing

T2 - Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing

JF - Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing

SN - 1049-5142

IS - 1

ER -