Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to assess the reliability, validity and use of the Family Star Plus, one of several Outcomes Stars increasingly used as part of outcomes-based accountability approaches in the delivery of family support services. The Family Star Plus measures progress towards effective parenting but a lack of evidence exists on its psychometric properties and suitability for use as an outcomes tool.
Design/methodology/approach: Based on data from 1,255 families receiving a pilot support service, Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the 10-item scale, while principal component analysis (PCA) examined the number of constructs in the tool. Using matched data from evaluation of 80 families, correlations between the Family Star Plus and psychometrically validated tools were used to assess concurrent validity. Findings from a process evaluation explore practical issues around use of the tool.
Findings: Cronbach’s alpha indicated sufficient internal reliability of the Family Star Plus; however, the PCA raised questions concerning the internal validity the Star. Correlations between the Star and validated tools were not strong enough to support concurrent validity of the Star. Process evaluation findings highlight inconsistencies in Family Star Plus data capture, which may explain these differences.
Practical implications: Further work is required before the Family Star Plus can be considered for use as an outcome measure.
Originality/value: To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed analysis of the psychometric qualities of the Family Star Plus.
Design/methodology/approach: Based on data from 1,255 families receiving a pilot support service, Cronbach’s alpha was used to assess the internal reliability of the 10-item scale, while principal component analysis (PCA) examined the number of constructs in the tool. Using matched data from evaluation of 80 families, correlations between the Family Star Plus and psychometrically validated tools were used to assess concurrent validity. Findings from a process evaluation explore practical issues around use of the tool.
Findings: Cronbach’s alpha indicated sufficient internal reliability of the Family Star Plus; however, the PCA raised questions concerning the internal validity the Star. Correlations between the Star and validated tools were not strong enough to support concurrent validity of the Star. Process evaluation findings highlight inconsistencies in Family Star Plus data capture, which may explain these differences.
Practical implications: Further work is required before the Family Star Plus can be considered for use as an outcome measure.
Originality/value: To the best of authors’ knowledge, this is the first peer-reviewed analysis of the psychometric qualities of the Family Star Plus.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 109-122 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Journal of Children's Services |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 6 Aug 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 3 Oct 2020 |
Bibliographical note
This article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Keywords
- Evaluation
- Family support
- Outcomes stars
- Psychometrics
- Reliability
- Validity
- article
- child parent relation
- concurrent validity
- Cronbach alpha coefficient
- human
- internal validity
- outcome assessment
- principal component analysis
- psychometry