TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the benefits of decentralised residential batteries for load peak shaving
AU - Jankowiak, Corentin
AU - Zacharopoulos, Aggelos
AU - Brandoni, Caterina
AU - Keatley, Patrick
AU - MacArtain, Paul
AU - Hewitt, Neil
PY - 2020/12/1
Y1 - 2020/12/1
N2 - The deployment of distributed, behind-the-meter batteries operating on a peak-shaving mode, could benefit the electricity network, by providing optimal and location-specific services, increasing the penetration of intermittent renewable sources, and deferring costly network upgrades. However, the quantitative assessment of the benefits of load peak-shaving and its impact on the distribution network remains a challenge. The present paper introduces a metric of five indexes to evaluate the technical performances of load peak shaving. This metric is applied on a case study, based on a photovoltaic and battery system application for a test house in Northern Ireland, whose electricity demand is representative of the average UK demand profile. Two peak shaving strategies are compared with a more usual self-consumption mode, and the impact of the battery size is evaluated. Peak-shaving management strategies show promising performance by reducing peaks by more than 98%, while still decreasing the yearly consumption by 15%, and avoiding 75% of the photovoltaic-generated energy to be exported back to the grid. The economic analysis compared the net present values achieved under two different tariff policies. Using a peak-shaving incentivising tariff remunerating customers £0.24 per kWh of peak shaved allowed to maintain profitability with a capacity cost of up to £400/kWh, compared to only £150/kWh for a usual flat tariff scheme. Such an incentive is a step forward in promoting customers to purchase a larger battery and to operate it in a way that benefits the grid operator.
AB - The deployment of distributed, behind-the-meter batteries operating on a peak-shaving mode, could benefit the electricity network, by providing optimal and location-specific services, increasing the penetration of intermittent renewable sources, and deferring costly network upgrades. However, the quantitative assessment of the benefits of load peak-shaving and its impact on the distribution network remains a challenge. The present paper introduces a metric of five indexes to evaluate the technical performances of load peak shaving. This metric is applied on a case study, based on a photovoltaic and battery system application for a test house in Northern Ireland, whose electricity demand is representative of the average UK demand profile. Two peak shaving strategies are compared with a more usual self-consumption mode, and the impact of the battery size is evaluated. Peak-shaving management strategies show promising performance by reducing peaks by more than 98%, while still decreasing the yearly consumption by 15%, and avoiding 75% of the photovoltaic-generated energy to be exported back to the grid. The economic analysis compared the net present values achieved under two different tariff policies. Using a peak-shaving incentivising tariff remunerating customers £0.24 per kWh of peak shaved allowed to maintain profitability with a capacity cost of up to £400/kWh, compared to only £150/kWh for a usual flat tariff scheme. Such an incentive is a step forward in promoting customers to purchase a larger battery and to operate it in a way that benefits the grid operator.
KW - Peak Shaving
KW - Integrated Battery
KW - Energy Storage Control Strategies
KW - Decentralized Control
KW - Domestic Sector
UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/assessing-the-benefits-of-decentralised-residential-batteries-for
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85089546354&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.est.2020.101779
DO - 10.1016/j.est.2020.101779
M3 - Article
SN - 2352-152X
VL - 32
JO - Journal of Energy Storage
JF - Journal of Energy Storage
M1 - 101779
ER -