Approximate Number System development in preschool: What factors predict change?

David Purpura, Victoria Simms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.
LanguageEnglish
Pages31-39
JournalCognitive Development
Volume45
Early online date20 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 20 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

system development
performance
preschool age
number of children
preschool child
mathematics
regression
school
evidence

Keywords

  • mathematics
  • numeracy
  • approximate number system
  • response inhibition
  • cardinal number knowledge

Cite this

@article{d1d97cdbbd7240efb1d6d3f24318bf3a,
title = "Approximate Number System development in preschool: What factors predict change?",
abstract = "A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.",
keywords = "mathematics, numeracy, approximate number system, response inhibition, cardinal number knowledge",
author = "David Purpura and Victoria Simms",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "31--39",

}

Approximate Number System development in preschool: What factors predict change? / Purpura, David; Simms, Victoria.

Vol. 45, 20.11.2017, p. 31-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approximate Number System development in preschool: What factors predict change?

AU - Purpura, David

AU - Simms, Victoria

PY - 2017/11/20

Y1 - 2017/11/20

N2 - A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.

AB - A large body of work has developed over the last decade examining the relation between the approximate number system (ANS) and mathematical performance across a wide range of ages, but particularly for preschool-age children. Largely, the evidence is mixed and suggests that a small relation exists that is dependent on a number of child-related or measurement-related factors. In contrast, little work has focused on understanding the stability and predictors of the ANS. These issues were examined by assessing 113 preschool children in the fall and spring of the preschool year on mathematical and cognitive assessments. Mixed-effect regressions indicated fall ANS performance was the strong predictor of spring ANS performance, suggesting moderate stability of this variable during preschool. However, cardinality and response inhibition were also significant predictors, and school-level variance was high. These findings indicate that the ANS may not be as foundational for mathematics development as previously suggested.

KW - mathematics

KW - numeracy

KW - approximate number system

KW - response inhibition

KW - cardinal number knowledge

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.001

M3 - Article

VL - 45

SP - 31

EP - 39

ER -