Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Anxiety related distractibility deficits: too much smartphone use is not such a smart call

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Smartphones can increase productivity and ease accessing information, however the possible negative implications for high smartphone use or problematic smartphone use (PSU) are not fully understood. The current study examined anxiety-linked memory and attention deficits to determine whether PSU moderates these relationships. Cross-sectional data from 506 young adults aged 18–29 years (68% female) were analysed in separate regression models to investigate whether PSU (Mobile Phone Problem Use scale) moderated the relationship between state and trait anxiety (State-Cognitive and Trait-Cognitive subscales of State Trait Inventory for Cognitive and Somatic Anxiety) and everyday memory and attentional failures (the False Triggering, Forgetfulness and Distractibility subscales of the Cognitive Failures Questionnaire). Our results showed that PSU moderated the combined influence of state and trait anxiety for distractibility, such that those who reported higher PSU and higher trait anxiety reported greater errors of distractibility during higher, but not lower state anxiety. However, our predictions for false triggering and forgetfulness were not supported; the only significant finding was a trend for higher trait anxiety to be related to increased failures of false triggering and forgetfulness. Real-world implications of findings are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3253 - 3260
Number of pages8
JournalBehaviour and Information Technology
VolumeVol 43, 2024
Issue number13
Early online date30 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 30 Oct 2023

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • Smartphone use
  • Attention
  • Memory
  • Cognitive failures
  • Young people

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Anxiety related distractibility deficits: too much smartphone use is not such a smart call'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this