Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross sectional survey of parents and professionals.

Heather Skirton, Owen Barr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAntenatal screening for fetal abnormalities is now offered to all pregnant women in many countries in Europe. Previous studies have shown that women and their partners may not make informed choices about screening.ObjectivesTo investigate knowledge of screening in both prospective parents and professionals offering screening in England, and to identify the ways in which pregnant women and their partners could be supported to make informed decisions about antenatal screening.DesignCross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from July 2007 to January 2008 using two self-completion questionnaires.Setting and participantsQuestionnaires were completed by: (i) pregnant women (n=100) and their partners (n=11), and (ii) midwives involved in offering antenatal screening (n=78).MeasurementsDemographic data and survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations.FindingsSome midwives lack accurate knowledge about screening and the conditions for which screening is offered. Parents wish to have information about screening at an earlier stage and would like the prospective father to be included in screening discussions. There is evidence that many parents do not perceive the second trimester ultrasound scan as a method of screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome would be seen as helpful by many parents.Key conclusionsFurther efforts need to be made to educate midwives more fully so that pregnant women and their partners are able to make informed choices about screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome should be available to prospective parents to support their decision making.
LanguageEnglish
JournalMidwidery
VolumeIn pre
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 19 Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Prenatal Diagnosis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Parents
Pregnant Women
Midwifery
Down Syndrome
Second Pregnancy Trimester
Fathers
England
Decision Making
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

@article{8c131823567f4b70a1dd172a4bc7c071,
title = "Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross sectional survey of parents and professionals.",
abstract = "AbstractBackgroundAntenatal screening for fetal abnormalities is now offered to all pregnant women in many countries in Europe. Previous studies have shown that women and their partners may not make informed choices about screening.ObjectivesTo investigate knowledge of screening in both prospective parents and professionals offering screening in England, and to identify the ways in which pregnant women and their partners could be supported to make informed decisions about antenatal screening.DesignCross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from July 2007 to January 2008 using two self-completion questionnaires.Setting and participantsQuestionnaires were completed by: (i) pregnant women (n=100) and their partners (n=11), and (ii) midwives involved in offering antenatal screening (n=78).MeasurementsDemographic data and survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations.FindingsSome midwives lack accurate knowledge about screening and the conditions for which screening is offered. Parents wish to have information about screening at an earlier stage and would like the prospective father to be included in screening discussions. There is evidence that many parents do not perceive the second trimester ultrasound scan as a method of screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome would be seen as helpful by many parents.Key conclusionsFurther efforts need to be made to educate midwives more fully so that pregnant women and their partners are able to make informed choices about screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome should be available to prospective parents to support their decision making.",
author = "Heather Skirton and Owen Barr",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.002",
language = "English",
volume = "In pre",
journal = "Midwifery",
issn = "0266-6138",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross sectional survey of parents and professionals. / Skirton, Heather; Barr, Owen.

In: Midwidery, Vol. In pre, 19.02.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antenatal screening and informed choice: a cross sectional survey of parents and professionals.

AU - Skirton, Heather

AU - Barr, Owen

PY - 2009/2/19

Y1 - 2009/2/19

N2 - AbstractBackgroundAntenatal screening for fetal abnormalities is now offered to all pregnant women in many countries in Europe. Previous studies have shown that women and their partners may not make informed choices about screening.ObjectivesTo investigate knowledge of screening in both prospective parents and professionals offering screening in England, and to identify the ways in which pregnant women and their partners could be supported to make informed decisions about antenatal screening.DesignCross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from July 2007 to January 2008 using two self-completion questionnaires.Setting and participantsQuestionnaires were completed by: (i) pregnant women (n=100) and their partners (n=11), and (ii) midwives involved in offering antenatal screening (n=78).MeasurementsDemographic data and survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations.FindingsSome midwives lack accurate knowledge about screening and the conditions for which screening is offered. Parents wish to have information about screening at an earlier stage and would like the prospective father to be included in screening discussions. There is evidence that many parents do not perceive the second trimester ultrasound scan as a method of screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome would be seen as helpful by many parents.Key conclusionsFurther efforts need to be made to educate midwives more fully so that pregnant women and their partners are able to make informed choices about screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome should be available to prospective parents to support their decision making.

AB - AbstractBackgroundAntenatal screening for fetal abnormalities is now offered to all pregnant women in many countries in Europe. Previous studies have shown that women and their partners may not make informed choices about screening.ObjectivesTo investigate knowledge of screening in both prospective parents and professionals offering screening in England, and to identify the ways in which pregnant women and their partners could be supported to make informed decisions about antenatal screening.DesignCross-sectional survey design. Data were collected from July 2007 to January 2008 using two self-completion questionnaires.Setting and participantsQuestionnaires were completed by: (i) pregnant women (n=100) and their partners (n=11), and (ii) midwives involved in offering antenatal screening (n=78).MeasurementsDemographic data and survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics and cross-tabulations.FindingsSome midwives lack accurate knowledge about screening and the conditions for which screening is offered. Parents wish to have information about screening at an earlier stage and would like the prospective father to be included in screening discussions. There is evidence that many parents do not perceive the second trimester ultrasound scan as a method of screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome would be seen as helpful by many parents.Key conclusionsFurther efforts need to be made to educate midwives more fully so that pregnant women and their partners are able to make informed choices about screening. Balanced information about the lives of people with Down syndrome should be available to prospective parents to support their decision making.

U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.002

DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2009.01.002

M3 - Article

VL - In pre

JO - Midwifery

T2 - Midwifery

JF - Midwifery

SN - 0266-6138

ER -