Analysis of the Use of e-procurement in the Public and Private Sectors of the UK Construction Industry

Robert Eadie, Srinath Perera, George Heaney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Eadie (2010a, 2010b) identified 20 advantages in the adoption of e-procurement within a construction organisation. The Glover report (2008) indicated that by the end of 2010 all public sector procurement should be electronic. The use of e-procurement within the construction industry has been inadequately researched. Martin (2009) examined quantity surveying organisations perspectives on the use of e-procurement across the United Kingdom. This paper seeks to address the knowledge gap that exists in the analysis of the level of usage of e-procurement within the construction industry. It compares the findings for the construction industry with other industries on company size and spend. Martin (2009) does not seek to investigate the size or spend on procurement activities of those quantity surveying organisations who have adopted e-procurement.This paper investigates the correlations between size, procurement spend and adoption of e-procurement in construction organisations comparing it with other industries. It concludes that the findings of Griloa and Jardim-Goncalves (2010) and European Commission (2007) were correct in suggesting that the AEC sector has been lagging behind other sectors in the adoption of e-procurement and provides a breakdown of the different types of organisations who currently use e-procurement.It further identifies the size of organisations which have implemented e-procurement within construction. On the client and consultant side in traditional contracts, company sizes of 21-50 employees make the highest use of e-procurement. This confirms that when analysing according to the size of organisation, construction organisations perform in a similar way to other industries as reported in Batenburg (2007) and Gunasekarana and Ngai (2008). However, this study indicates that very small companies may still be put off by the costs of software (corroborates De Boer et al, 2002; Kauffman and Mohtadi, 2004).The study proposes the types of construction organisation most likely to be utilising the benefits of e-procurement in construction by procurement spend and size. It also indicates that the deadlines in the Glover report (2008) relating to e-procurement in construction are unlikely to be met.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-686
JournalJournal of Information Technology in Construction
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 16 May 2011

Bibliographical note

Reference text: Batenburg, R., 2007. „E-procurement Adoption by European Firms: A Quantitative Analysis‟ in Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management. Vol 13 (3), 182-192.
BIS (2010), Small and Medium-sized Enterprise (SME) Statistics for the UK and Regions 2009 (SME Statistics), available on-line at [Accessed January 2010]
Carayannis E. and Popescu D. (2005). Profiling a methodology for economic growth and convergence: learning from the EU e-procurement experience for central and eastern European countries, Technovation, Vol. 25 1-14.
Davila A., Gupta M., and Palmer R. (2003). Moving Procurement Systems to the Internet: The Adoption and Use of E-Procurement Technology Models, European Management Journal, Vol 21, No.1, 11-23.
De Boer, L, Harink,J, Heijboer, G (2002), A conceptual model for assessing the impact of electronic procurement, in European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Vol 8 (1), 25-33.
De-Miguel-Molina, M (2010), E-Government in Spain: An Analysis of the Right to Quality E-Government, in International Journal of Public Administration,Vol. 33(1), 1- 10.
Eadie, R., Perera, S., Heaney, G., Carlisle, J. (2007) Drivers and Barriers to Public Sector e-procurement within Northern Ireland‟s Construction Industry, ITcon Journal, Vol. 12, 103-120,
Eadie R., Perera S., Heaney G. (2010a) “Identification of E-Procurement Drivers and Barriers for UK Construction Organisations and Ranking of these from the Perspective of Quantity Surveyors”, ITcon Vol. 15, pp. 23-43,
Eadie R., Perera S., Heaney G. (2010b) “A Cross Discipline Comparison of Rankings of E-Procurement Drivers and Barriers for UK Construction Organisations”, ITcon Vol. 15, pp. 217-233,
Egbu C. Vines M. and Tookey J. (2004). The Role of Knowledge Management in E-Procurement Initiatives for Construction Organisations, Proceedings of ARCOM Twentieth Annual Conference 2004, September 1-3, Heriot Watt University, (Khosrowshami,F Editor), Vol. 1, Arcom, University of Reading, Reading, 661 – 671.
European Commission (2010) ICT and e-Business for an Innovative and Sustainable Economy, 7th Synthesis Report of the Sectoral e-Business Watch (2010), available on-line at [accessed January 2010].
European Commission (2007), The European E-business report, A portrait of e-business in 10 sectors of the EU economy, 5th Synthesis Report of the e-Business W@tch, available on-line at [accessed January 2010]
Glover A. (2008). Accelerating the SME economic engine: through transparent, simple and strategic procurement, HM Treasury :London.
Griloa A and Jardim-Goncalves R (2010), Challenging electronic procurement in the AEC sector: A BIM-based integrated perspective, in Automation in Construction Vol 20 (2) 107-114.
Gunasekarana and Ngai (2008). Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research, in International Journal of Production Economics, Vol 113, (1) Research and Applications in E-Commerce and Third-Party Logistics Management; Special Section on Meta-standards in Operations Management: Cross-disciplinary perspectives, 159-175.
Hawking P., Stein A., Wyld D. and Forster S. (2004). E-Procurement: Is the Ugly Duckling Actually a Swan Down Under?, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2004, 1-26.
Hore A. O‟Connell L. and West R. (2006). Efficiency Gains to be Won through the Introduction of Electronic Tendering in the Construction Industry, available on-line at [accessed December 2008]
Improvement and Development Agency (IDEA)(2004). The Benefits of e-Procurement, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, HMSO, UK, available on-line at [assessed December 2008]
Kauffman and Mohtadi (2004), Proprietary and Open Systems Adoption in E-Procurement: A Risk-Augmented Transaction Cost Perspective, in Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol 21. 137 – 166.
Kheng C. and Al-hawamdeh S. (2002). The adoption of electronic procurement in Singapore, Electronic Commerce Research Vol. 2 Springer Netherlands. 61-73.
Martin J. (2009). 2009 BCIS E-Tendering Report (Available online [accessed February 2011].
OCG, (2005). e-Procurement in Action – A guide to e-procurement for the public sector. Office of Government Commerce Available on-line at: http// [accessed on February 2011].
Office of the Inspector General(OIG) (1997). Audit of the Office of Program and Integrity Reviews` Special Studies, available on-line at [assessed December 2008]
Pearcy, D. and Guinipero, L. (2008), “Using e-procurement applications to achieve integration: what role does firm size play?”, in Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 26-34.
Rankin J., Chen Y. and Christian A. (2006). E-procurement in the Atlantic Canadian AEC industry, ITcon Vol. 11, Special Issue e-Commerce in construction , available on-line at, [accessed January 2010]. 75-87.
Rogers, E.M., (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press, New York.
Rubin A, Babbie E (2004), Research Methods of Social Work, Thomson Wadsworth, UK, 288-289.
Tindsley G. and Stephenson P. (2008). E-Tendering Process Within Construction: A UK Perspective, Tsinghua Science & Technology, Vol 13, Supplement 1, October 2008, 273-278.
Wang, Y.C., Chang, C. and Heng, M. (2004), The levels of information technology adoption, business network, and strategic position model for evaluating supply chain integration, in Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 5(2). 85-98.


  • e-procurement
  • Use of e-procurement


Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of the Use of e-procurement in the Public and Private Sectors of the UK Construction Industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this