An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture

Jeannie Donnelly, John Winder, George Kernohan, Mike Stevenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: A randomised controlled trial set out to determine whether there are differences between complete offloading and standard care in terms of the number of new pressure ulcers (PUs) developing on the heels of older patients with fractured hips and the number or severity of new PUs on other areas of their bodies. Method: Patients aged over 65 years in a fracture trauma unit with fractured hips were randomly allocated to receive heel elevation (DM Systems, Evanston, Illinois) plus pressure-redistributing support surface or standard care (pressure-redistributing support surface alone). Exclusion criteria included existing heel damage. Patients were assessed on pre- and postoperative days for the occurrence of new pressure damage. Patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at discharge. Results: 119 patients were recruited into the control group and 120 into the intervention group. Independent t-tests and chi-squared analysis showed both groups were comparable at baseline. Thirty-one subjects (26%) in the control group developed PUs compared with eight in the intervention group (7%, p
LanguageEnglish
Pages309-318
JournalJournal of Wound Care
Volume20
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 14 Jul 2011

Fingerprint

Heel
Pressure Ulcer
Hip Fractures
Equipment and Supplies
Pressure
Hip
Control Groups
Trauma Centers
Randomized Controlled Trials

Cite this

Donnelly, Jeannie ; Winder, John ; Kernohan, George ; Stevenson, Mike. / An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture. In: Journal of Wound Care. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. 7. pp. 309-318.
@article{67b90936f7b14caa82197beb5bbed55c,
title = "An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture",
abstract = "Objective: A randomised controlled trial set out to determine whether there are differences between complete offloading and standard care in terms of the number of new pressure ulcers (PUs) developing on the heels of older patients with fractured hips and the number or severity of new PUs on other areas of their bodies. Method: Patients aged over 65 years in a fracture trauma unit with fractured hips were randomly allocated to receive heel elevation (DM Systems, Evanston, Illinois) plus pressure-redistributing support surface or standard care (pressure-redistributing support surface alone). Exclusion criteria included existing heel damage. Patients were assessed on pre- and postoperative days for the occurrence of new pressure damage. Patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at discharge. Results: 119 patients were recruited into the control group and 120 into the intervention group. Independent t-tests and chi-squared analysis showed both groups were comparable at baseline. Thirty-one subjects (26{\%}) in the control group developed PUs compared with eight in the intervention group (7{\%}, p",
author = "Jeannie Donnelly and John Winder and George Kernohan and Mike Stevenson",
year = "2011",
month = "7",
day = "14",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "309--318",
journal = "Journal of Wound Care",
issn = "0969-0700",
number = "7",

}

An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture. / Donnelly, Jeannie; Winder, John; Kernohan, George; Stevenson, Mike.

In: Journal of Wound Care, Vol. 20, No. 7, 14.07.2011, p. 309-318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An RCT to determine the effect of a heel elevation device in pressure ulcer prevention post-hip fracture

AU - Donnelly, Jeannie

AU - Winder, John

AU - Kernohan, George

AU - Stevenson, Mike

PY - 2011/7/14

Y1 - 2011/7/14

N2 - Objective: A randomised controlled trial set out to determine whether there are differences between complete offloading and standard care in terms of the number of new pressure ulcers (PUs) developing on the heels of older patients with fractured hips and the number or severity of new PUs on other areas of their bodies. Method: Patients aged over 65 years in a fracture trauma unit with fractured hips were randomly allocated to receive heel elevation (DM Systems, Evanston, Illinois) plus pressure-redistributing support surface or standard care (pressure-redistributing support surface alone). Exclusion criteria included existing heel damage. Patients were assessed on pre- and postoperative days for the occurrence of new pressure damage. Patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at discharge. Results: 119 patients were recruited into the control group and 120 into the intervention group. Independent t-tests and chi-squared analysis showed both groups were comparable at baseline. Thirty-one subjects (26%) in the control group developed PUs compared with eight in the intervention group (7%, p

AB - Objective: A randomised controlled trial set out to determine whether there are differences between complete offloading and standard care in terms of the number of new pressure ulcers (PUs) developing on the heels of older patients with fractured hips and the number or severity of new PUs on other areas of their bodies. Method: Patients aged over 65 years in a fracture trauma unit with fractured hips were randomly allocated to receive heel elevation (DM Systems, Evanston, Illinois) plus pressure-redistributing support surface or standard care (pressure-redistributing support surface alone). Exclusion criteria included existing heel damage. Patients were assessed on pre- and postoperative days for the occurrence of new pressure damage. Patients completed a satisfaction questionnaire at discharge. Results: 119 patients were recruited into the control group and 120 into the intervention group. Independent t-tests and chi-squared analysis showed both groups were comparable at baseline. Thirty-one subjects (26%) in the control group developed PUs compared with eight in the intervention group (7%, p

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 309

EP - 318

JO - Journal of Wound Care

T2 - Journal of Wound Care

JF - Journal of Wound Care

SN - 0969-0700

IS - 7

ER -