An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage

Michael Delichatsios

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The paper presents the results of the CFD inter-comparison exercise SBEP-V3, performed within the activity InsHyde, internal project of the HySafe network of excellence, in the framework of evaluating the capability of various CFD tools and modelling approaches in predicting the short and long term mixing and distribution of hydrogen releases in confined spaces. The experiment simulated was INERIS-TEST-6C, performed within the InsHyde project by INERIS, consisting of a 1 g/s vertical hydrogen release for 240s from an orifice of 20 mm diameter into a rectangular room (garage) of dimensions 3.78 x 7.2 x 2.88 In in width, length and height respectively. Two small openings at the bottom of the front side of the room assured constant pressure conditions. During the test hydrogen concentration time histories were measured at 12 positions in the room, for a period up to 5160 s after the end of release, covering both the release and the subsequent diffusion phases. The benchmark was organized in two phases. The first phase consisted of blind simulations per-formed prior to the execution of the tests. The second phase consisted of post-calculations performed after the tests were concluded and the experimental results made available. The participation in the benchmark was high: 12 different organizations (2 non-HySafe partners), 10 different CFD codes and 8 different turbulence models. Large variation in predicted results was found in the first phase of the benchmark, between the various modelling approaches. This was attributed mainly to differences in turbulence models and numerical accuracy options (time/space resolution and discretization schemes). During the second phase of the benchmark the variation between predicted results was reduced. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages5912-5923
    JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
    Volume34
    Issue number14, Sp
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

    Fingerprint

    Computational fluid dynamics
    Turbulence models
    Hydrogen
    Orifices
    Experiments

    Cite this

    @article{086c99d99d1c434ea9ff84e008b2a569,
    title = "An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage",
    abstract = "The paper presents the results of the CFD inter-comparison exercise SBEP-V3, performed within the activity InsHyde, internal project of the HySafe network of excellence, in the framework of evaluating the capability of various CFD tools and modelling approaches in predicting the short and long term mixing and distribution of hydrogen releases in confined spaces. The experiment simulated was INERIS-TEST-6C, performed within the InsHyde project by INERIS, consisting of a 1 g/s vertical hydrogen release for 240s from an orifice of 20 mm diameter into a rectangular room (garage) of dimensions 3.78 x 7.2 x 2.88 In in width, length and height respectively. Two small openings at the bottom of the front side of the room assured constant pressure conditions. During the test hydrogen concentration time histories were measured at 12 positions in the room, for a period up to 5160 s after the end of release, covering both the release and the subsequent diffusion phases. The benchmark was organized in two phases. The first phase consisted of blind simulations per-formed prior to the execution of the tests. The second phase consisted of post-calculations performed after the tests were concluded and the experimental results made available. The participation in the benchmark was high: 12 different organizations (2 non-HySafe partners), 10 different CFD codes and 8 different turbulence models. Large variation in predicted results was found in the first phase of the benchmark, between the various modelling approaches. This was attributed mainly to differences in turbulence models and numerical accuracy options (time/space resolution and discretization schemes). During the second phase of the benchmark the variation between predicted results was reduced. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
    author = "Michael Delichatsios",
    note = "2nd International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Sebastian, SPAIN, SEP, 2007",
    year = "2009",
    month = "7",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.055",
    language = "English",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "5912--5923",
    journal = "International Journal of Hydrogen Energy",
    issn = "0360-3199",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "14, Sp",

    }

    An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage. / Delichatsios, Michael.

    In: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 34, No. 14, Sp, 07.2009, p. 5912-5923.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An inter-comparison exercise on the capabilities of CFD models to predict the short and long term distribution and mixing of hydrogen in a garage

    AU - Delichatsios, Michael

    N1 - 2nd International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Sebastian, SPAIN, SEP, 2007

    PY - 2009/7

    Y1 - 2009/7

    N2 - The paper presents the results of the CFD inter-comparison exercise SBEP-V3, performed within the activity InsHyde, internal project of the HySafe network of excellence, in the framework of evaluating the capability of various CFD tools and modelling approaches in predicting the short and long term mixing and distribution of hydrogen releases in confined spaces. The experiment simulated was INERIS-TEST-6C, performed within the InsHyde project by INERIS, consisting of a 1 g/s vertical hydrogen release for 240s from an orifice of 20 mm diameter into a rectangular room (garage) of dimensions 3.78 x 7.2 x 2.88 In in width, length and height respectively. Two small openings at the bottom of the front side of the room assured constant pressure conditions. During the test hydrogen concentration time histories were measured at 12 positions in the room, for a period up to 5160 s after the end of release, covering both the release and the subsequent diffusion phases. The benchmark was organized in two phases. The first phase consisted of blind simulations per-formed prior to the execution of the tests. The second phase consisted of post-calculations performed after the tests were concluded and the experimental results made available. The participation in the benchmark was high: 12 different organizations (2 non-HySafe partners), 10 different CFD codes and 8 different turbulence models. Large variation in predicted results was found in the first phase of the benchmark, between the various modelling approaches. This was attributed mainly to differences in turbulence models and numerical accuracy options (time/space resolution and discretization schemes). During the second phase of the benchmark the variation between predicted results was reduced. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    AB - The paper presents the results of the CFD inter-comparison exercise SBEP-V3, performed within the activity InsHyde, internal project of the HySafe network of excellence, in the framework of evaluating the capability of various CFD tools and modelling approaches in predicting the short and long term mixing and distribution of hydrogen releases in confined spaces. The experiment simulated was INERIS-TEST-6C, performed within the InsHyde project by INERIS, consisting of a 1 g/s vertical hydrogen release for 240s from an orifice of 20 mm diameter into a rectangular room (garage) of dimensions 3.78 x 7.2 x 2.88 In in width, length and height respectively. Two small openings at the bottom of the front side of the room assured constant pressure conditions. During the test hydrogen concentration time histories were measured at 12 positions in the room, for a period up to 5160 s after the end of release, covering both the release and the subsequent diffusion phases. The benchmark was organized in two phases. The first phase consisted of blind simulations per-formed prior to the execution of the tests. The second phase consisted of post-calculations performed after the tests were concluded and the experimental results made available. The participation in the benchmark was high: 12 different organizations (2 non-HySafe partners), 10 different CFD codes and 8 different turbulence models. Large variation in predicted results was found in the first phase of the benchmark, between the various modelling approaches. This was attributed mainly to differences in turbulence models and numerical accuracy options (time/space resolution and discretization schemes). During the second phase of the benchmark the variation between predicted results was reduced. (C) 2009 International Association for Hydrogen Energy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.055

    DO - 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.01.055

    M3 - Article

    VL - 34

    SP - 5912

    EP - 5923

    JO - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

    T2 - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

    JF - International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

    SN - 0360-3199

    IS - 14, Sp

    ER -