An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

We compare two aspects of meaning, namely the presupposition of stop in the scope of negation (John didn’t stop going to the movies on Wednesday., → John used to go to the movies before Wednesday.) and scalar implicatures associated with strong scalar items under negation (John didn’t always go to the movie last week. → John sometimes went to the movies last week.) (‘Indirect Scalar Implicatures’ (ISIs) Chierchia, 2004). Our results replicate the finding by Chemla and Bott (2013) that global presupposition interpretations are faster with a different methodology that avoids a potential confound of response bias. More surprisingly, ISIs are found to pattern with presuppositions in that responses reflecting an interpretation without an inference (corresponding to a ‘literal’ interpretation) are slower than ones based on the relevant inference, contrary to what has been found for direct scalar implicatures. These results are puzzling from the traditional perspective that ISIs are generated in the same way as direct implicatures. We explore two possible interpretations: first, strong scalar terms could receive a presuppositional analysis as well and presuppose that their domain is non-empty. Alternatively, we could group stop and ISIs together from another angle and see them as obligatory scalar implicatures, in contrast to the non-obligatory direct ones.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationexperimental perspectives on presuppositions
Editorsflorian schwarz
Pages215-240
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 3 Oct 2014

Fingerprint

scalars
inference
response bias
methodology

Keywords

  • semantics
  • pragmatics
  • language processing
  • presuppositions

Cite this

Romoli, J. (Accepted/In press). An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures. In F. schwarz (Ed.), experimental perspectives on presuppositions (pp. 215-240)
Romoli, Jacopo. / An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures. experimental perspectives on presuppositions. editor / florian schwarz. 2014. pp. 215-240
@inbook{ed29112980254e5382c91fe1bbbf9703,
title = "An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures",
abstract = "We compare two aspects of meaning, namely the presupposition of stop in the scope of negation (John didn’t stop going to the movies on Wednesday., → John used to go to the movies before Wednesday.) and scalar implicatures associated with strong scalar items under negation (John didn’t always go to the movie last week. → John sometimes went to the movies last week.) (‘Indirect Scalar Implicatures’ (ISIs) Chierchia, 2004). Our results replicate the finding by Chemla and Bott (2013) that global presupposition interpretations are faster with a different methodology that avoids a potential confound of response bias. More surprisingly, ISIs are found to pattern with presuppositions in that responses reflecting an interpretation without an inference (corresponding to a ‘literal’ interpretation) are slower than ones based on the relevant inference, contrary to what has been found for direct scalar implicatures. These results are puzzling from the traditional perspective that ISIs are generated in the same way as direct implicatures. We explore two possible interpretations: first, strong scalar terms could receive a presuppositional analysis as well and presuppose that their domain is non-empty. Alternatively, we could group stop and ISIs together from another angle and see them as obligatory scalar implicatures, in contrast to the non-obligatory direct ones.",
keywords = "semantics, pragmatics, language processing, presuppositions",
author = "Jacopo Romoli",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "3",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-07979-0",
pages = "215--240",
editor = "florian schwarz",
booktitle = "experimental perspectives on presuppositions",

}

Romoli, J 2014, An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures. in F schwarz (ed.), experimental perspectives on presuppositions. pp. 215-240.

An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures. / Romoli, Jacopo.

experimental perspectives on presuppositions. ed. / florian schwarz. 2014. p. 215-240.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures

AU - Romoli, Jacopo

PY - 2014/10/3

Y1 - 2014/10/3

N2 - We compare two aspects of meaning, namely the presupposition of stop in the scope of negation (John didn’t stop going to the movies on Wednesday., → John used to go to the movies before Wednesday.) and scalar implicatures associated with strong scalar items under negation (John didn’t always go to the movie last week. → John sometimes went to the movies last week.) (‘Indirect Scalar Implicatures’ (ISIs) Chierchia, 2004). Our results replicate the finding by Chemla and Bott (2013) that global presupposition interpretations are faster with a different methodology that avoids a potential confound of response bias. More surprisingly, ISIs are found to pattern with presuppositions in that responses reflecting an interpretation without an inference (corresponding to a ‘literal’ interpretation) are slower than ones based on the relevant inference, contrary to what has been found for direct scalar implicatures. These results are puzzling from the traditional perspective that ISIs are generated in the same way as direct implicatures. We explore two possible interpretations: first, strong scalar terms could receive a presuppositional analysis as well and presuppose that their domain is non-empty. Alternatively, we could group stop and ISIs together from another angle and see them as obligatory scalar implicatures, in contrast to the non-obligatory direct ones.

AB - We compare two aspects of meaning, namely the presupposition of stop in the scope of negation (John didn’t stop going to the movies on Wednesday., → John used to go to the movies before Wednesday.) and scalar implicatures associated with strong scalar items under negation (John didn’t always go to the movie last week. → John sometimes went to the movies last week.) (‘Indirect Scalar Implicatures’ (ISIs) Chierchia, 2004). Our results replicate the finding by Chemla and Bott (2013) that global presupposition interpretations are faster with a different methodology that avoids a potential confound of response bias. More surprisingly, ISIs are found to pattern with presuppositions in that responses reflecting an interpretation without an inference (corresponding to a ‘literal’ interpretation) are slower than ones based on the relevant inference, contrary to what has been found for direct scalar implicatures. These results are puzzling from the traditional perspective that ISIs are generated in the same way as direct implicatures. We explore two possible interpretations: first, strong scalar terms could receive a presuppositional analysis as well and presuppose that their domain is non-empty. Alternatively, we could group stop and ISIs together from another angle and see them as obligatory scalar implicatures, in contrast to the non-obligatory direct ones.

KW - semantics

KW - pragmatics

KW - language processing

KW - presuppositions

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-07979-0

SP - 215

EP - 240

BT - experimental perspectives on presuppositions

A2 - schwarz, florian

ER -

Romoli J. An Experimental Comparison between Presuppositions and Indirect Scalar Implicatures. In schwarz F, editor, experimental perspectives on presuppositions. 2014. p. 215-240