An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use

Gemma P Faulkner, Barbara Livingstone, Kirsty Pourshahidi, Michelle Spence, Moira Dean, Sinead O’Brien, Eileen R Gibney, Julie MW Wallace, Tracy A McCaffrey, Maeve Kerr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).Design: A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.Setting: For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.Subjects: Males and females aged 18–64 years (n 120).Results: The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights forestimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all P
LanguageEnglish
Pages2377-2387
JournalPublic Health Nutrition
Volume19
Issue number13
Early online date9 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Portion Size
Food
Meals
Serving Size
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Portion size
  • Obesity
  • Consumer
  • Energy intake

Cite this

Faulkner, Gemma P ; Livingstone, Barbara ; Pourshahidi, Kirsty ; Spence, Michelle ; Dean, Moira ; O’Brien, Sinead ; Gibney, Eileen R ; Wallace, Julie MW ; McCaffrey, Tracy A ; Kerr, Maeve. / An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use. In: Public Health Nutrition. 2016 ; Vol. 19, No. 13. pp. 2377-2387.
@article{3cddef0862ac483496bc95efef2e717c,
title = "An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use",
abstract = "Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).Design: A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.Setting: For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.Subjects: Males and females aged 18–64 years (n 120).Results: The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights forestimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 {\%}), particularly dinner (86 {\%}) in the home (89 {\%}; all P",
keywords = "Portion size, Obesity, Consumer, Energy intake",
author = "Faulkner, {Gemma P} and Barbara Livingstone and Kirsty Pourshahidi and Michelle Spence and Moira Dean and Sinead O’Brien and Gibney, {Eileen R} and Wallace, {Julie MW} and McCaffrey, {Tracy A} and Maeve Kerr",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S1368980016000082",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "2377--2387",
journal = "Public Health Nutrition",
issn = "1368-9800",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "13",

}

An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use. / Faulkner, Gemma P; Livingstone, Barbara; Pourshahidi, Kirsty; Spence, Michelle; Dean, Moira; O’Brien, Sinead; Gibney, Eileen R; Wallace, Julie MW; McCaffrey, Tracy A; Kerr, Maeve.

In: Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 19, No. 13, 09.2016, p. 2377-2387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An evaluation of portion size estimation aids: precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use

AU - Faulkner, Gemma P

AU - Livingstone, Barbara

AU - Pourshahidi, Kirsty

AU - Spence, Michelle

AU - Dean, Moira

AU - O’Brien, Sinead

AU - Gibney, Eileen R

AU - Wallace, Julie MW

AU - McCaffrey, Tracy A

AU - Kerr, Maeve

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).Design: A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.Setting: For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.Subjects: Males and females aged 18–64 years (n 120).Results: The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights forestimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all P

AB - Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the precision, ease of use and likelihood of future use of portion size estimation aids (PSEA).Design: A range of PSEA were used to estimate the serving sizes of a range of commonly eaten foods and rated for ease of use and likelihood of future usage.Setting: For each food, participants selected their preferred PSEA from a range of options including: quantities and measures; reference objects; measuring; and indicators on food packets. These PSEA were used to serve out various foods (e.g. liquid, amorphous, and composite dishes). Ease of use and likelihood of future use were noted. The foods were weighed to determine the precision of each PSEA.Subjects: Males and females aged 18–64 years (n 120).Results: The quantities and measures were the most precise PSEA (lowest range of weights for estimated portion sizes). However, participants preferred household measures (e.g. 200 ml disposable cup) – deemed easy to use (median rating of 5), likely to use again in future (all scored either 4 or 5 on a scale from 1=‘not very likely’ to 5=‘very likely to use again’) and precise (narrow range of weights forestimated portion sizes). The majority indicated they would most likely use the PSEA preparing a meal (94 %), particularly dinner (86 %) in the home (89 %; all P

KW - Portion size

KW - Obesity

KW - Consumer

KW - Energy intake

U2 - 10.1017/S1368980016000082

DO - 10.1017/S1368980016000082

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 2377

EP - 2387

JO - Public Health Nutrition

T2 - Public Health Nutrition

JF - Public Health Nutrition

SN - 1368-9800

IS - 13

ER -