An evaluation of contractors’ satisfaction with payment terms influencing construction cash fl ow

Henry Odeyinka, A Kaka

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Construction cash fl ow models developed in previous researches demonstrated thatcash fl ow profi les vary for differing procurement methods. However, the issue of whethercontractors are satisfi ed or dissatisfi ed with payment terms impacting cash fl ows indiffering procurement methods is yet to be investigated. This is the concern of this study.• The study identifi ed from literature, payment terms potentially thought to impactconstruction cash fl ow. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, a questionnaire survey wasadministered to UK construction contractors in order to assess their level of satisfactionwith identifi ed payment terms infl uencing construction cash fl ow. Responsesfrom the survey, which focused on traditional and design and build procurement methodswere analysed using mean response analysis and one-way analysis of variance.• Results showed that while contractors were satisfi ed with most of the contractualfactors investigated under both procurement systems, they were dissatisfi ed with two ofthe factors, namely, time lag between entitlement to receive and actually receiving cashpayment and percentage of contract sum retained. This dissatisfaction calls for actionto consider devising alternative means of dealing with retention and delay payments.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages171-180
    JournalJournal of Financial Management of Property and Construction
    Volume10
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2005

    Fingerprint

    Cash
    Contractors
    Evaluation
    Payment
    Procurement
    Analysis of variance
    Factors
    Dissatisfaction
    Time lag
    Entitlement
    Questionnaire survey

    Keywords

    • cash flow
    • design and build contract
    • payment term
    • traditional procurement

    Cite this

    @article{a57c167517204c37b9abf98f705e5b03,
    title = "An evaluation of contractors’ satisfaction with payment terms influencing construction cash fl ow",
    abstract = "Construction cash fl ow models developed in previous researches demonstrated thatcash fl ow profi les vary for differing procurement methods. However, the issue of whethercontractors are satisfi ed or dissatisfi ed with payment terms impacting cash fl ows indiffering procurement methods is yet to be investigated. This is the concern of this study.• The study identifi ed from literature, payment terms potentially thought to impactconstruction cash fl ow. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, a questionnaire survey wasadministered to UK construction contractors in order to assess their level of satisfactionwith identifi ed payment terms infl uencing construction cash fl ow. Responsesfrom the survey, which focused on traditional and design and build procurement methodswere analysed using mean response analysis and one-way analysis of variance.• Results showed that while contractors were satisfi ed with most of the contractualfactors investigated under both procurement systems, they were dissatisfi ed with two ofthe factors, namely, time lag between entitlement to receive and actually receiving cashpayment and percentage of contract sum retained. This dissatisfaction calls for actionto consider devising alternative means of dealing with retention and delay payments.",
    keywords = "cash flow, design and build contract, payment term, traditional procurement",
    author = "Henry Odeyinka and A Kaka",
    year = "2005",
    month = "12",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "171--180",
    journal = "Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction",
    issn = "1366-4387",
    number = "3",

    }

    An evaluation of contractors’ satisfaction with payment terms influencing construction cash fl ow. / Odeyinka, Henry; Kaka, A.

    In: Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, Vol. 10, No. 3, 12.2005, p. 171-180.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An evaluation of contractors’ satisfaction with payment terms influencing construction cash fl ow

    AU - Odeyinka, Henry

    AU - Kaka, A

    PY - 2005/12

    Y1 - 2005/12

    N2 - Construction cash fl ow models developed in previous researches demonstrated thatcash fl ow profi les vary for differing procurement methods. However, the issue of whethercontractors are satisfi ed or dissatisfi ed with payment terms impacting cash fl ows indiffering procurement methods is yet to be investigated. This is the concern of this study.• The study identifi ed from literature, payment terms potentially thought to impactconstruction cash fl ow. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, a questionnaire survey wasadministered to UK construction contractors in order to assess their level of satisfactionwith identifi ed payment terms infl uencing construction cash fl ow. Responsesfrom the survey, which focused on traditional and design and build procurement methodswere analysed using mean response analysis and one-way analysis of variance.• Results showed that while contractors were satisfi ed with most of the contractualfactors investigated under both procurement systems, they were dissatisfi ed with two ofthe factors, namely, time lag between entitlement to receive and actually receiving cashpayment and percentage of contract sum retained. This dissatisfaction calls for actionto consider devising alternative means of dealing with retention and delay payments.

    AB - Construction cash fl ow models developed in previous researches demonstrated thatcash fl ow profi les vary for differing procurement methods. However, the issue of whethercontractors are satisfi ed or dissatisfi ed with payment terms impacting cash fl ows indiffering procurement methods is yet to be investigated. This is the concern of this study.• The study identifi ed from literature, payment terms potentially thought to impactconstruction cash fl ow. Using a 6-point Likert-type scale, a questionnaire survey wasadministered to UK construction contractors in order to assess their level of satisfactionwith identifi ed payment terms infl uencing construction cash fl ow. Responsesfrom the survey, which focused on traditional and design and build procurement methodswere analysed using mean response analysis and one-way analysis of variance.• Results showed that while contractors were satisfi ed with most of the contractualfactors investigated under both procurement systems, they were dissatisfi ed with two ofthe factors, namely, time lag between entitlement to receive and actually receiving cashpayment and percentage of contract sum retained. This dissatisfaction calls for actionto consider devising alternative means of dealing with retention and delay payments.

    KW - cash flow

    KW - design and build contract

    KW - payment term

    KW - traditional procurement

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 171

    EP - 180

    JO - Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction

    T2 - Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction

    JF - Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction

    SN - 1366-4387

    IS - 3

    ER -