An Empirical Analysis of the Likelihood of Confusion Factors in European Trade Mark Law

Ilanah Fhima, Catrina Denvir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The empirical study of trade mark law is in its infancy, particularly in the EU. However, it may have much to teach us about how trade mark law operates in practice, particularly in the context of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) case law, which, because of the structure of EU trade mark law, is necessarily quite abstract. This study employs empirical methods to understand how the test for the likelihood of confusion is operated by the courts. Influenced by developments in US academic writing, this is the first European study to employ empirical methodology to investigate which factors are having the most influence on how courts decide whether likely confusion is present in the cases. This study seeks to establish whether the factors adumbrated by the CJEU are being correctly applied by the lower courts. Although the authors found that the CJEU’s test is generally being applied, this study identifies the fact that the General Court is largely ignoring one of the factors, the distinctiveness of the senior trade mark.
LanguageEnglish
Pages310-339
JournalInternational Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law
Volume46
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2015

Fingerprint

trade law
European Law
court of justice
empirical method
case law
EU
methodology

Keywords

  • Trade markEuropeCJEUGeneral CourtEmpirical studyLikelihood of confusion

Cite this

@article{c07b013939534ba99bf0c2ae001497ba,
title = "An Empirical Analysis of the Likelihood of Confusion Factors in European Trade Mark Law",
abstract = "The empirical study of trade mark law is in its infancy, particularly in the EU. However, it may have much to teach us about how trade mark law operates in practice, particularly in the context of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) case law, which, because of the structure of EU trade mark law, is necessarily quite abstract. This study employs empirical methods to understand how the test for the likelihood of confusion is operated by the courts. Influenced by developments in US academic writing, this is the first European study to employ empirical methodology to investigate which factors are having the most influence on how courts decide whether likely confusion is present in the cases. This study seeks to establish whether the factors adumbrated by the CJEU are being correctly applied by the lower courts. Although the authors found that the CJEU’s test is generally being applied, this study identifies the fact that the General Court is largely ignoring one of the factors, the distinctiveness of the senior trade mark.",
keywords = "Trade markEuropeCJEUGeneral CourtEmpirical studyLikelihood of confusion",
author = "Ilanah Fhima and Catrina Denvir",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s40319-015-0311-6",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "310--339",
journal = "International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law",
issn = "0018-9855",
number = "3",

}

An Empirical Analysis of the Likelihood of Confusion Factors in European Trade Mark Law. / Fhima, Ilanah; Denvir, Catrina.

In: International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 46, No. 3, 03.05.2015, p. 310-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Empirical Analysis of the Likelihood of Confusion Factors in European Trade Mark Law

AU - Fhima, Ilanah

AU - Denvir, Catrina

PY - 2015/5/3

Y1 - 2015/5/3

N2 - The empirical study of trade mark law is in its infancy, particularly in the EU. However, it may have much to teach us about how trade mark law operates in practice, particularly in the context of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) case law, which, because of the structure of EU trade mark law, is necessarily quite abstract. This study employs empirical methods to understand how the test for the likelihood of confusion is operated by the courts. Influenced by developments in US academic writing, this is the first European study to employ empirical methodology to investigate which factors are having the most influence on how courts decide whether likely confusion is present in the cases. This study seeks to establish whether the factors adumbrated by the CJEU are being correctly applied by the lower courts. Although the authors found that the CJEU’s test is generally being applied, this study identifies the fact that the General Court is largely ignoring one of the factors, the distinctiveness of the senior trade mark.

AB - The empirical study of trade mark law is in its infancy, particularly in the EU. However, it may have much to teach us about how trade mark law operates in practice, particularly in the context of the Court of Justice of the European Union’s (CJEU) case law, which, because of the structure of EU trade mark law, is necessarily quite abstract. This study employs empirical methods to understand how the test for the likelihood of confusion is operated by the courts. Influenced by developments in US academic writing, this is the first European study to employ empirical methodology to investigate which factors are having the most influence on how courts decide whether likely confusion is present in the cases. This study seeks to establish whether the factors adumbrated by the CJEU are being correctly applied by the lower courts. Although the authors found that the CJEU’s test is generally being applied, this study identifies the fact that the General Court is largely ignoring one of the factors, the distinctiveness of the senior trade mark.

KW - Trade markEuropeCJEUGeneral CourtEmpirical studyLikelihood of confusion

U2 - 10.1007/s40319-015-0311-6

DO - 10.1007/s40319-015-0311-6

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 310

EP - 339

JO - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

T2 - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

JF - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law

SN - 0018-9855

IS - 3

ER -