Abstract
The development of accounting, auditing and capital markets in China were an integral omponent of China’s economic reforms; auditing was regarded as being critically important to achieving the desired policy objective of delivering a market economy (Yang and Yang, 1998). This article examines the quasi-qualification hypothesis and tests whether investors valued the introduction of Special Treatment (ST) status for firms in 1998. Our empirical analysis fails to find significant support for the quasi-qualification hypothesis. In contrast, it appears that the issuance of ST status was valued by investors; the issuance of ST status led investors to discriminate between firms.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1265-1271 |
| Journal | Applied Economics Letters |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'An analysis of quasi-qualification, modified auditor opinions and special treatment status on China’s Shenzhen market'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver