An Analysis of Data Sharing Platforms in Multidisciplinary

David Comiskey, Mark McKane, Andy Jaffrey, Paul Wilson, Stefan Mordue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of Common Data Environment (CDE) collaboration platforms, although a requirement of the government BIM (Building Information Modelling) mandate within the UK, is an area that has been under-reported in research publications, especially in relation to the education sector for the management of undergraduate multidisciplinary student BIM projects. Up to this point, academics have focused on the use of BIM authoring and analysis tools and collaborative and multidisciplinary working methods, but not necessarily on how information is managed and the platforms that can be used in this regard. This paper presents the findings of a three-year longitudinal study undertaken at Ulster University experimenting with three different platforms for the delivery of an undergraduate multidisciplinary collaborative student BIM project. A case study methodology is employed to provide a description of experiences over the three-year period, with an ethnographic approach to data collection in the form of direct observations in the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify key trends followed by a cross-case synthesis. The results of the study identify advantages for all of the differing platforms utilised depending on the functionality and learning outcomes required, whilst highlighting challenges in terms of familiarity and assessment integration. The paper concludes by presenting potential CDE methods of integration at undergraduate Levels 4, 5 and 6 (Years 1, 2 and 3).
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-18
JournalArchitectural Engineering and Design Management
Volume13
Early online date30 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Students
Education
Information modeling
Data sharing
Undergraduate
Data collection
Mandate
Learning outcomes
Longitudinal study
Government
Education sector
Thematic analysis
Methodology
Familiarity
Functionality

Keywords

  • Common Data Environment
  • multidisciplinary working
  • BIM
  • student collaboration
  • built environment education

Cite this

@article{836d9de424854db8b73d718d63b760f9,
title = "An Analysis of Data Sharing Platforms in Multidisciplinary",
abstract = "The use of Common Data Environment (CDE) collaboration platforms, although a requirement of the government BIM (Building Information Modelling) mandate within the UK, is an area that has been under-reported in research publications, especially in relation to the education sector for the management of undergraduate multidisciplinary student BIM projects. Up to this point, academics have focused on the use of BIM authoring and analysis tools and collaborative and multidisciplinary working methods, but not necessarily on how information is managed and the platforms that can be used in this regard. This paper presents the findings of a three-year longitudinal study undertaken at Ulster University experimenting with three different platforms for the delivery of an undergraduate multidisciplinary collaborative student BIM project. A case study methodology is employed to provide a description of experiences over the three-year period, with an ethnographic approach to data collection in the form of direct observations in the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify key trends followed by a cross-case synthesis. The results of the study identify advantages for all of the differing platforms utilised depending on the functionality and learning outcomes required, whilst highlighting challenges in terms of familiarity and assessment integration. The paper concludes by presenting potential CDE methods of integration at undergraduate Levels 4, 5 and 6 (Years 1, 2 and 3).",
keywords = "Common Data Environment, multidisciplinary working, BIM, student collaboration, built environment education",
author = "David Comiskey and Mark McKane and Andy Jaffrey and Paul Wilson and Stefan Mordue",
year = "2017",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/17452007.2017.1306483",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Architectural Engineering and Design Management",
issn = "1745-2007",

}

An Analysis of Data Sharing Platforms in Multidisciplinary. / Comiskey, David; McKane, Mark; Jaffrey, Andy; Wilson, Paul; Mordue, Stefan.

In: Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol. 13, 30.03.2017, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Analysis of Data Sharing Platforms in Multidisciplinary

AU - Comiskey, David

AU - McKane, Mark

AU - Jaffrey, Andy

AU - Wilson, Paul

AU - Mordue, Stefan

PY - 2017/3/30

Y1 - 2017/3/30

N2 - The use of Common Data Environment (CDE) collaboration platforms, although a requirement of the government BIM (Building Information Modelling) mandate within the UK, is an area that has been under-reported in research publications, especially in relation to the education sector for the management of undergraduate multidisciplinary student BIM projects. Up to this point, academics have focused on the use of BIM authoring and analysis tools and collaborative and multidisciplinary working methods, but not necessarily on how information is managed and the platforms that can be used in this regard. This paper presents the findings of a three-year longitudinal study undertaken at Ulster University experimenting with three different platforms for the delivery of an undergraduate multidisciplinary collaborative student BIM project. A case study methodology is employed to provide a description of experiences over the three-year period, with an ethnographic approach to data collection in the form of direct observations in the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify key trends followed by a cross-case synthesis. The results of the study identify advantages for all of the differing platforms utilised depending on the functionality and learning outcomes required, whilst highlighting challenges in terms of familiarity and assessment integration. The paper concludes by presenting potential CDE methods of integration at undergraduate Levels 4, 5 and 6 (Years 1, 2 and 3).

AB - The use of Common Data Environment (CDE) collaboration platforms, although a requirement of the government BIM (Building Information Modelling) mandate within the UK, is an area that has been under-reported in research publications, especially in relation to the education sector for the management of undergraduate multidisciplinary student BIM projects. Up to this point, academics have focused on the use of BIM authoring and analysis tools and collaborative and multidisciplinary working methods, but not necessarily on how information is managed and the platforms that can be used in this regard. This paper presents the findings of a three-year longitudinal study undertaken at Ulster University experimenting with three different platforms for the delivery of an undergraduate multidisciplinary collaborative student BIM project. A case study methodology is employed to provide a description of experiences over the three-year period, with an ethnographic approach to data collection in the form of direct observations in the field. Thematic analysis is used to identify key trends followed by a cross-case synthesis. The results of the study identify advantages for all of the differing platforms utilised depending on the functionality and learning outcomes required, whilst highlighting challenges in terms of familiarity and assessment integration. The paper concludes by presenting potential CDE methods of integration at undergraduate Levels 4, 5 and 6 (Years 1, 2 and 3).

KW - Common Data Environment

KW - multidisciplinary working

KW - BIM

KW - student collaboration

KW - built environment education

U2 - 10.1080/17452007.2017.1306483

DO - 10.1080/17452007.2017.1306483

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Architectural Engineering and Design Management

T2 - Architectural Engineering and Design Management

JF - Architectural Engineering and Design Management

SN - 1745-2007

ER -