Alternatives to the mathematical modeling of beaches

Andrew Cooper, OH Pilkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

dDespite acknowledgement by scientists and modelers of the shortcomings of mathematical models of beach behaviour, they continue in widespread use for engineering design and environmental impact studies. In part, this is because of the assumed absence of a viable alternative approach to prediction. The objective of this paper is to suggest that a conceptual approach can succeed as an alternative to mathematical models for predictions with accuracy ranges useful for engineering and coastal management purposes. The most valuable information for prediction is past engineering experience on the beach in question or the experience on neighboring beaches. The next most useful may be the global experience on oceanographically similar beaches. Another approach is the use of geoindicators and field studies on the beach. The widely applied ``predict nothing'' approach to beach engineering may well work if fortified by common sense. Finally, a composite approach in which the assembled body of information on a stretch of coast is considered and used to provide an expert judgement on the likely course of future coastal behavior is considered the best option. In all cases a gradualism or go-slow approach is strongly recommended because no method can accurately predict the response to engineering of the complex natural coastal system. Answers from such approaches will be approximations with significant error bars expressed in qualitative terms but will be based on a reality that applied models with all their simplified assumptions and omissions are incapable of achieving.
LanguageEnglish
Pages641-644
JournalJournal of Coastal Research
Volume20
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Fingerprint

beach
engineering
modeling
prediction
gradualism
coastal zone management
coast

Cite this

@article{88690d2b483c45a891576d6f0394dca1,
title = "Alternatives to the mathematical modeling of beaches",
abstract = "dDespite acknowledgement by scientists and modelers of the shortcomings of mathematical models of beach behaviour, they continue in widespread use for engineering design and environmental impact studies. In part, this is because of the assumed absence of a viable alternative approach to prediction. The objective of this paper is to suggest that a conceptual approach can succeed as an alternative to mathematical models for predictions with accuracy ranges useful for engineering and coastal management purposes. The most valuable information for prediction is past engineering experience on the beach in question or the experience on neighboring beaches. The next most useful may be the global experience on oceanographically similar beaches. Another approach is the use of geoindicators and field studies on the beach. The widely applied ``predict nothing'' approach to beach engineering may well work if fortified by common sense. Finally, a composite approach in which the assembled body of information on a stretch of coast is considered and used to provide an expert judgement on the likely course of future coastal behavior is considered the best option. In all cases a gradualism or go-slow approach is strongly recommended because no method can accurately predict the response to engineering of the complex natural coastal system. Answers from such approaches will be approximations with significant error bars expressed in qualitative terms but will be based on a reality that applied models with all their simplified assumptions and omissions are incapable of achieving.",
author = "Andrew Cooper and OH Pilkey",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "641--644",
journal = "Journal of Coastal Research",
issn = "0749-0208",
number = "3",

}

Alternatives to the mathematical modeling of beaches. / Cooper, Andrew; Pilkey, OH.

In: Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2004, p. 641-644.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Alternatives to the mathematical modeling of beaches

AU - Cooper, Andrew

AU - Pilkey, OH

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - dDespite acknowledgement by scientists and modelers of the shortcomings of mathematical models of beach behaviour, they continue in widespread use for engineering design and environmental impact studies. In part, this is because of the assumed absence of a viable alternative approach to prediction. The objective of this paper is to suggest that a conceptual approach can succeed as an alternative to mathematical models for predictions with accuracy ranges useful for engineering and coastal management purposes. The most valuable information for prediction is past engineering experience on the beach in question or the experience on neighboring beaches. The next most useful may be the global experience on oceanographically similar beaches. Another approach is the use of geoindicators and field studies on the beach. The widely applied ``predict nothing'' approach to beach engineering may well work if fortified by common sense. Finally, a composite approach in which the assembled body of information on a stretch of coast is considered and used to provide an expert judgement on the likely course of future coastal behavior is considered the best option. In all cases a gradualism or go-slow approach is strongly recommended because no method can accurately predict the response to engineering of the complex natural coastal system. Answers from such approaches will be approximations with significant error bars expressed in qualitative terms but will be based on a reality that applied models with all their simplified assumptions and omissions are incapable of achieving.

AB - dDespite acknowledgement by scientists and modelers of the shortcomings of mathematical models of beach behaviour, they continue in widespread use for engineering design and environmental impact studies. In part, this is because of the assumed absence of a viable alternative approach to prediction. The objective of this paper is to suggest that a conceptual approach can succeed as an alternative to mathematical models for predictions with accuracy ranges useful for engineering and coastal management purposes. The most valuable information for prediction is past engineering experience on the beach in question or the experience on neighboring beaches. The next most useful may be the global experience on oceanographically similar beaches. Another approach is the use of geoindicators and field studies on the beach. The widely applied ``predict nothing'' approach to beach engineering may well work if fortified by common sense. Finally, a composite approach in which the assembled body of information on a stretch of coast is considered and used to provide an expert judgement on the likely course of future coastal behavior is considered the best option. In all cases a gradualism or go-slow approach is strongly recommended because no method can accurately predict the response to engineering of the complex natural coastal system. Answers from such approaches will be approximations with significant error bars expressed in qualitative terms but will be based on a reality that applied models with all their simplified assumptions and omissions are incapable of achieving.

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 641

EP - 644

JO - Journal of Coastal Research

T2 - Journal of Coastal Research

JF - Journal of Coastal Research

SN - 0749-0208

IS - 3

ER -