Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) could help identify patients at risk of medication non-adherence, but the clinical readiness of published prediction models is uncertain. We systematically reviewed 41 adherence prediction modelling studies and assessed model development and evaluation using PROBAST + AI across participants/data sources, predictors, outcomes, and analyses. Most models showed great concern for development quality (71%) and high risk of bias in evaluation (80%), commonly due to poorly defined adherence outcomes, inadequate handling of missing data, and limited validation. Reported discrimination did not consistently improve with more complex algorithms, indicating that methodological rigour, rather than model type, is the key barrier to translation. We provide framework-guided recommendations to improve robustness, interpretability, and clinical actionability of future adherence prediction models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | npj digital medicine |
| Early online date | 2 Sept 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published online - 2 Sept 2026 |
Bibliographical note
© The Author(s) 2026Funding
This study received no funding.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver