Additivity Pretraining and Cue Competition Effects: Developmental Evidence for a Reasoning-Based Account of Causal Learning

Victoria Simms, Teresa McCormack, Tom Beckers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The effect of additivity pretraining on blocking has been taken as evidence for a reasoning account of human and animal causal learning. If inferential reasoning underpins this effect, then developmental differences in the magnitude of this effect in children would be expected. Experiment 1 examined cue competition effects in children’s (4- to 5-year-olds and 6- to 7-year-olds) causal learning using a new paradigm analogous to the food allergy task used in studies of human adult causal learning. Blocking was stronger in the older than the younger children, and additivity pretraining only affected blocking in the older group. Unovershadowing was not affected by age or by pretraining. In experiment 2, levels of blocking were found to be correlated with the ability to answer questions that required children to reason about additivity. Our results support an inferential reasoning explanation of cue competition effects.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)180-190
    JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes
    Volume38
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Additivity Pretraining and Cue Competition Effects: Developmental Evidence for a Reasoning-Based Account of Causal Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this