Accuracy of psychometric tools in the assessment of personality in adolescents and adults requesting gender-affirming treatments: a systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The assessment and screening for personality disorders in individuals requesting gender affirming treatments may be an important aspect of predicting medical and surgical outcomes for this population, but there is no consensus on how best to do so.
Aims: To review the diagnostic accuracy of psychometric tools used for the assessment of personality disorders in those requesting gender affirming treatments.
Method: A systematic review: Prospero CRD42017078783 [1].
Results: Many studies have focussed on the assessment of personality disorders in this population, but since 1979, only two have used an index and reference test.
Conclusion: There are no agreed reference standards for this population and psychometric tools continue to be scored on reference data from the cisgender (not transgender) population. We need robust evidence on this issue, as individuals may be denied access to gender affirming treatments based on psychometric tools without established reliability in this population.
LanguageEnglish
Pages60-67
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Psychiatry
Volume62
Early online date20 Sep 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Personality Assessment
Psychometrics
Personality Disorders
Population
Transgender Persons
Therapeutics
Consensus

Keywords

  • Gender dysphoria, psychological assessment, psychometric tools, systematic review
  • Psychometry and assessments in psychiatry
  • Gender
  • Social and cross cultural psychiatry
  • Personality disorders
  • Sexual disorders

Cite this

@article{22caaaf51f2940ba82527aa5ef56dbd1,
title = "Accuracy of psychometric tools in the assessment of personality in adolescents and adults requesting gender-affirming treatments: a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: The assessment and screening for personality disorders in individuals requesting gender affirming treatments may be an important aspect of predicting medical and surgical outcomes for this population, but there is no consensus on how best to do so. Aims: To review the diagnostic accuracy of psychometric tools used for the assessment of personality disorders in those requesting gender affirming treatments. Method: A systematic review: Prospero CRD42017078783 [1].Results: Many studies have focussed on the assessment of personality disorders in this population, but since 1979, only two have used an index and reference test. Conclusion: There are no agreed reference standards for this population and psychometric tools continue to be scored on reference data from the cisgender (not transgender) population. We need robust evidence on this issue, as individuals may be denied access to gender affirming treatments based on psychometric tools without established reliability in this population.",
keywords = "Gender dysphoria, psychological assessment, psychometric tools, systematic review, Psychometry and assessments in psychiatry, Gender, Social and cross cultural psychiatry, Personality disorders, Sexual disorders",
author = "Katrin Lehmann and Gerard Leavey",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.09.004",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "60--67",
journal = "European Psychiatry",
issn = "0924-9338",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of psychometric tools in the assessment of personality in adolescents and adults requesting gender-affirming treatments: a systematic review

AU - Lehmann, Katrin

AU - Leavey, Gerard

PY - 2019/10/31

Y1 - 2019/10/31

N2 - Background: The assessment and screening for personality disorders in individuals requesting gender affirming treatments may be an important aspect of predicting medical and surgical outcomes for this population, but there is no consensus on how best to do so. Aims: To review the diagnostic accuracy of psychometric tools used for the assessment of personality disorders in those requesting gender affirming treatments. Method: A systematic review: Prospero CRD42017078783 [1].Results: Many studies have focussed on the assessment of personality disorders in this population, but since 1979, only two have used an index and reference test. Conclusion: There are no agreed reference standards for this population and psychometric tools continue to be scored on reference data from the cisgender (not transgender) population. We need robust evidence on this issue, as individuals may be denied access to gender affirming treatments based on psychometric tools without established reliability in this population.

AB - Background: The assessment and screening for personality disorders in individuals requesting gender affirming treatments may be an important aspect of predicting medical and surgical outcomes for this population, but there is no consensus on how best to do so. Aims: To review the diagnostic accuracy of psychometric tools used for the assessment of personality disorders in those requesting gender affirming treatments. Method: A systematic review: Prospero CRD42017078783 [1].Results: Many studies have focussed on the assessment of personality disorders in this population, but since 1979, only two have used an index and reference test. Conclusion: There are no agreed reference standards for this population and psychometric tools continue to be scored on reference data from the cisgender (not transgender) population. We need robust evidence on this issue, as individuals may be denied access to gender affirming treatments based on psychometric tools without established reliability in this population.

KW - Gender dysphoria, psychological assessment, psychometric tools, systematic review

KW - Psychometry and assessments in psychiatry

KW - Gender

KW - Social and cross cultural psychiatry

KW - Personality disorders

KW - Sexual disorders

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072289754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.09.004

DO - 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.09.004

M3 - Article

VL - 62

SP - 60

EP - 67

JO - European Psychiatry

T2 - European Psychiatry

JF - European Psychiatry

SN - 0924-9338

ER -