Accommodative function in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Pamela Anketell, Kathryn J Saunders, Stephen Gallagher, Clare Bailey, Julie-Anne Little

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a reported prevalence of 1.1-1.5%. Accommodative dysfunction has been noted in other developmental conditions including cerebral palsy and Down’s syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate how accommodative accuracy and near visual function in ASD compared to typically developing controls. Methods: Accommodative accuracy was assessed using modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Individual accommodative demand and response was calculated incorporating residual refractive error (difference between cycloplegic and habitual refractive state). Near visual measures included; near visual acuity (NVA), near point of convergence, fusional reserves and stereoacuity. Cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed refractive error. Results: Accommodative responses were measured from 124 participants with ASD (6-17 years) and 204 age-matched controls. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of residual refractive error between groups (p=0.10). The prevalence of a clinically significant lag of accommodation was greater in the ASD group compared to controls (ASD=17.4%, controls=4.9%, χ2=13.04, p/=+2.00D, >1.00DC), and when these were removed from analysis, there was still an increased prevalence of hypoaccommodation in ASD (14.7%). Conclusion: Children with ASD were significantly more likely to have accommodative deficits (and associated near visual deficits) in their presenting refractive state than typically developing children. Appraisal of refractive error, accommodation and near visual acuity should be considered in visual assessment of children with ASD.
LanguageEnglish
Pages193-201
JournalOptometry and Vision Science
Volume95
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Refractive Errors
Mydriatics
Visual Acuity
Retinoscopy
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Cerebral Palsy
Down Syndrome

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • autism
  • Asperger’s syndrome
  • accommodation
  • refractive error
  • near vision
  • near visual acuity

Cite this

@article{50e53c25c21443f18497ff44ae8e8bf4,
title = "Accommodative function in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder",
abstract = "Purpose: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a reported prevalence of 1.1-1.5{\%}. Accommodative dysfunction has been noted in other developmental conditions including cerebral palsy and Down’s syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate how accommodative accuracy and near visual function in ASD compared to typically developing controls. Methods: Accommodative accuracy was assessed using modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Individual accommodative demand and response was calculated incorporating residual refractive error (difference between cycloplegic and habitual refractive state). Near visual measures included; near visual acuity (NVA), near point of convergence, fusional reserves and stereoacuity. Cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed refractive error. Results: Accommodative responses were measured from 124 participants with ASD (6-17 years) and 204 age-matched controls. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of residual refractive error between groups (p=0.10). The prevalence of a clinically significant lag of accommodation was greater in the ASD group compared to controls (ASD=17.4{\%}, controls=4.9{\%}, χ2=13.04, p/=+2.00D, >1.00DC), and when these were removed from analysis, there was still an increased prevalence of hypoaccommodation in ASD (14.7{\%}). Conclusion: Children with ASD were significantly more likely to have accommodative deficits (and associated near visual deficits) in their presenting refractive state than typically developing children. Appraisal of refractive error, accommodation and near visual acuity should be considered in visual assessment of children with ASD.",
keywords = "Autism spectrum disorder, autism, Asperger’s syndrome, accommodation, refractive error, near vision, near visual acuity",
author = "Pamela Anketell and Saunders, {Kathryn J} and Stephen Gallagher and Clare Bailey and Julie-Anne Little",
note = "UIR Compliant - evidence uploaded to other files",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/OPX.0000000000001190",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "193--201",
journal = "Optometry and Vision Science",
issn = "1040-5488",
number = "3",

}

Accommodative function in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder. / Anketell, Pamela; Saunders, Kathryn J; Gallagher, Stephen; Bailey, Clare; Little, Julie-Anne.

In: Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 95, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 193-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Accommodative function in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder

AU - Anketell, Pamela

AU - Saunders, Kathryn J

AU - Gallagher, Stephen

AU - Bailey, Clare

AU - Little, Julie-Anne

N1 - UIR Compliant - evidence uploaded to other files

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Purpose: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a reported prevalence of 1.1-1.5%. Accommodative dysfunction has been noted in other developmental conditions including cerebral palsy and Down’s syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate how accommodative accuracy and near visual function in ASD compared to typically developing controls. Methods: Accommodative accuracy was assessed using modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Individual accommodative demand and response was calculated incorporating residual refractive error (difference between cycloplegic and habitual refractive state). Near visual measures included; near visual acuity (NVA), near point of convergence, fusional reserves and stereoacuity. Cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed refractive error. Results: Accommodative responses were measured from 124 participants with ASD (6-17 years) and 204 age-matched controls. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of residual refractive error between groups (p=0.10). The prevalence of a clinically significant lag of accommodation was greater in the ASD group compared to controls (ASD=17.4%, controls=4.9%, χ2=13.04, p/=+2.00D, >1.00DC), and when these were removed from analysis, there was still an increased prevalence of hypoaccommodation in ASD (14.7%). Conclusion: Children with ASD were significantly more likely to have accommodative deficits (and associated near visual deficits) in their presenting refractive state than typically developing children. Appraisal of refractive error, accommodation and near visual acuity should be considered in visual assessment of children with ASD.

AB - Purpose: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder with a reported prevalence of 1.1-1.5%. Accommodative dysfunction has been noted in other developmental conditions including cerebral palsy and Down’s syndrome. The aim of this study was to investigate how accommodative accuracy and near visual function in ASD compared to typically developing controls. Methods: Accommodative accuracy was assessed using modified Nott dynamic retinoscopy. Individual accommodative demand and response was calculated incorporating residual refractive error (difference between cycloplegic and habitual refractive state). Near visual measures included; near visual acuity (NVA), near point of convergence, fusional reserves and stereoacuity. Cycloplegic autorefraction confirmed refractive error. Results: Accommodative responses were measured from 124 participants with ASD (6-17 years) and 204 age-matched controls. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of residual refractive error between groups (p=0.10). The prevalence of a clinically significant lag of accommodation was greater in the ASD group compared to controls (ASD=17.4%, controls=4.9%, χ2=13.04, p/=+2.00D, >1.00DC), and when these were removed from analysis, there was still an increased prevalence of hypoaccommodation in ASD (14.7%). Conclusion: Children with ASD were significantly more likely to have accommodative deficits (and associated near visual deficits) in their presenting refractive state than typically developing children. Appraisal of refractive error, accommodation and near visual acuity should be considered in visual assessment of children with ASD.

KW - Autism spectrum disorder

KW - autism

KW - Asperger’s syndrome

KW - accommodation

KW - refractive error

KW - near vision

KW - near visual acuity

U2 - 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001190

DO - 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001190

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 193

EP - 201

JO - Optometry and Vision Science

T2 - Optometry and Vision Science

JF - Optometry and Vision Science

SN - 1040-5488

IS - 3

ER -