Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Academic achievement at ages 11 and 16 in children born with congenital anomalies in England: A multi‐registry linked cohort study

  • Svetlana Glinianaia
  • , Joachim Tan
  • , Joan K Morris
  • , Jo Brigden
  • , Hannah ER Evans
  • , Maria Loane
  • , Amanda J Neville
  • , Judith Rankin

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

100 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Children born with major congenital anomalies (CAs) have lower academic achievement compared with their peers, but the existing evidence is restricted to a number of specific CAs.
Objectives: To investigate academic outcomes at ages 11 and 16 years in children with major isolated structural CAs and children with Down or Turner syndromes.
Methods: This population-based cohort study linked data on approximately 11,000 school-aged children born with major CAs in 1994-2004 registered by four regional CA registries in England with education data from the National Pupil Database (NPD). The comparison group was a random sample of children without major CAs from the background population recorded in the NPD that were frequency matched (5:1) to children with CAs by birth year, sex and geographical area.
Results: Overall, 71.9%, 73.0% and 80.9% of children with isolated structural CAs achieved the expected attainment level at age 11 compared to 78.3%, 80.6% and 86.7% of the comparison group in English language, mathematics and science respectively. Children with nervous system CAs as a whole had the lowest proportion who achieved the expected attainment at age 11. At age 16, 46.9% of children with CAs achieved the expected level compared to 52.5% of their peers. Major CAs were associated with being up to 9% (95% CI 8%, 11%) and 12% (95% CI 9%, 14%) less likely to achieve expected levels at ages 11 and 16 respectively, after adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation.
Conclusions: Although many children with isolated CAs achieved the expected academic level at age 11 and 16 years, they were at higher risk of underachievement compared to their peers. These stark yet cautiously encouraging results are important for counselling parents of children with specific CAs and also highlight the possible need for special education support to reduce potential academic difficulties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)411-425
Number of pages15
JournalPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
Volume38
Issue number5
Early online date6 Feb 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 30 Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Data Availability Statement

The Department for Education is the controller of the data that support the findings of this study. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Third-party requests for the data will require permission from the Department for Education.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 733001 (Jan 2017–May 2022) (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en).

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020733001

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 4 - Quality Education
      SDG 4 Quality Education

    Keywords

    • school-age children;
    • birth defects;
    • special education
    • academic performance;
    • school-aged children
    • academic performance
    • birth defects

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Academic achievement at ages 11 and 16 in children born with congenital anomalies in England: A multi‐registry linked cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this