A Typology of the Parent–Child Relationship in a Population Sample

T. Paul de Cock, M Shevlin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Estimating the early parent–child bonding relationship can be valuable in research and practice. Retrospective dimensional measures of parental bonding provide a means for assessing the experience of the early parent–child relationship. However, combinations of dimensional scores may provide information that is not readily captured with a dimensional approach. This study was designed to assess the presence of homogeneous groups in the population with similar profiles on parental bonding dimensions. Using a short version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), three parental bonding dimensions (care, authoritarianism, and overprotection) were used to assess the presence of unobserved groups in the population using latent profile analysis. The class solutions were regressed on 23 covariates (demographics, parental psychopathology, loss events, and childhood contextual factors) to assess the validity of the class solution. The results indicated four distinct profiles of parental bonding for fathers as well as mothers. Parental bonding profiles were significantly associated with a broad range of covariates. This person-centered approach to parental bonding has broad utility in future research which takes into account the effect of parent–child bonding, especially with regard to “affectionless control” style parenting.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-13
Number of pages13
JournalSAGE Open
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 Aug 2014

Fingerprint

parenting style
parent-child relationship
typology
authoritarianism
psychopathology
father
parents
Group
childhood
human being
event
experience

Keywords

  • parental bonding
  • affectionless control
  • attachment
  • Latent variable modelling

Cite this

@article{5749e8537a854473bd8a123b2f053596,
title = "A Typology of the Parent–Child Relationship in a Population Sample",
abstract = "Estimating the early parent–child bonding relationship can be valuable in research and practice. Retrospective dimensional measures of parental bonding provide a means for assessing the experience of the early parent–child relationship. However, combinations of dimensional scores may provide information that is not readily captured with a dimensional approach. This study was designed to assess the presence of homogeneous groups in the population with similar profiles on parental bonding dimensions. Using a short version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), three parental bonding dimensions (care, authoritarianism, and overprotection) were used to assess the presence of unobserved groups in the population using latent profile analysis. The class solutions were regressed on 23 covariates (demographics, parental psychopathology, loss events, and childhood contextual factors) to assess the validity of the class solution. The results indicated four distinct profiles of parental bonding for fathers as well as mothers. Parental bonding profiles were significantly associated with a broad range of covariates. This person-centered approach to parental bonding has broad utility in future research which takes into account the effect of parent–child bonding, especially with regard to “affectionless control” style parenting.",
keywords = "parental bonding, affectionless control, attachment, Latent variable modelling",
author = "{de Cock}, {T. Paul} and M Shevlin",
year = "2014",
month = "8",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1177/2158244014547325",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "SAGE Open",
issn = "2158-2440",
number = "3",

}

A Typology of the Parent–Child Relationship in a Population Sample. / de Cock, T. Paul; Shevlin, M.

In: SAGE Open, Vol. 4, No. 3, 14.08.2014, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Typology of the Parent–Child Relationship in a Population Sample

AU - de Cock, T. Paul

AU - Shevlin, M

PY - 2014/8/14

Y1 - 2014/8/14

N2 - Estimating the early parent–child bonding relationship can be valuable in research and practice. Retrospective dimensional measures of parental bonding provide a means for assessing the experience of the early parent–child relationship. However, combinations of dimensional scores may provide information that is not readily captured with a dimensional approach. This study was designed to assess the presence of homogeneous groups in the population with similar profiles on parental bonding dimensions. Using a short version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), three parental bonding dimensions (care, authoritarianism, and overprotection) were used to assess the presence of unobserved groups in the population using latent profile analysis. The class solutions were regressed on 23 covariates (demographics, parental psychopathology, loss events, and childhood contextual factors) to assess the validity of the class solution. The results indicated four distinct profiles of parental bonding for fathers as well as mothers. Parental bonding profiles were significantly associated with a broad range of covariates. This person-centered approach to parental bonding has broad utility in future research which takes into account the effect of parent–child bonding, especially with regard to “affectionless control” style parenting.

AB - Estimating the early parent–child bonding relationship can be valuable in research and practice. Retrospective dimensional measures of parental bonding provide a means for assessing the experience of the early parent–child relationship. However, combinations of dimensional scores may provide information that is not readily captured with a dimensional approach. This study was designed to assess the presence of homogeneous groups in the population with similar profiles on parental bonding dimensions. Using a short version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), three parental bonding dimensions (care, authoritarianism, and overprotection) were used to assess the presence of unobserved groups in the population using latent profile analysis. The class solutions were regressed on 23 covariates (demographics, parental psychopathology, loss events, and childhood contextual factors) to assess the validity of the class solution. The results indicated four distinct profiles of parental bonding for fathers as well as mothers. Parental bonding profiles were significantly associated with a broad range of covariates. This person-centered approach to parental bonding has broad utility in future research which takes into account the effect of parent–child bonding, especially with regard to “affectionless control” style parenting.

KW - parental bonding

KW - affectionless control

KW - attachment

KW - Latent variable modelling

U2 - 10.1177/2158244014547325

DO - 10.1177/2158244014547325

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - SAGE Open

T2 - SAGE Open

JF - SAGE Open

SN - 2158-2440

IS - 3

ER -