“A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life

Banin de Witt Jensen, Kevin Brazil, Sonja McIlfatrick, Peter Passmore P, Hilary Buchanan, Max Watson, Carole Parsons C

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: People dying with advanced dementia areoften unable to effectively self-report pain and are at riskof under-assessment which may hinder pain diagnosis andmanagement. Pain assessment tools for use in advanceddementia are available but their use by physicians withdying patients has not been explored.Aims: To explore hospice, secondary and primary carephysicians’ use of pain assessment tools with patientsdying with advanced dementia.Methods: Twenty-three, semi-structured, face-to-facephysician interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim.Thematic analysis was applied to identify corethemes across healthcare settings. Three researchers verifiedfinal themes.Results: Four key themes emerged: non-use of painassessment tools; perceived limitations of tools; clinicaloutcomes of use and improving pain assessment. Physiciansdid not routinely use pain assessment tools withpatients dying with advanced dementia. Information fromphysical examination, physiological parameters andpatient observation in addition to collateral patient historyfrom families and nursing staff were perceived to providea more reliable and holistic approach to assessment andmanagement. Scoring subjectivity, proxy-reporting andoverreliance on nonverbal and behavioural cues were limitationsassociated with pain tools. Physicians perceived theclinical outcome of pain tool use to be quicker identificationand reporting of pain by nurses. Most physiciansbelieved pain assessment could be improved via betterintegration of secondary, hospice and primary care servicesin addition to ongoing medical education andmentoring.Conclusion: Physicians preferred clinical investigationand collateral patient history from family and other healthprofessionals to assess pain and guide management. Thesefindings have important implications for medical education,practice and health policy.Funding: HSC Research and Development Division, PublicHealth Agency, Northern Ireland.
LanguageEnglish
PagesNP37-NP37
JournalPalliative Medicine
Volume30
Issue number6
Early online date11 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Pain Measurement
Dementia
Physicians
Pain
Medical Education
Family Nursing
Hospice Care
Northern Ireland
Secondary Care
Hospices
Nursing Staff
Proxy
Pain Management
Health Policy
Self Report
Cues
Primary Health Care
Nurses
Research Personnel
Observation

Keywords

  • Pain assessment
  • dementia
  • end of life
  • physician

Cite this

de Witt Jensen, Banin ; Brazil, Kevin ; McIlfatrick, Sonja ; Passmore P, Peter ; Buchanan, Hilary ; Watson, Max ; Parsons C, Carole. / “A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life. In: Palliative Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. NP37-NP37.
@article{fb7123339f7a40a4805100f32bd7350c,
title = "“A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life",
abstract = "Background: People dying with advanced dementia areoften unable to effectively self-report pain and are at riskof under-assessment which may hinder pain diagnosis andmanagement. Pain assessment tools for use in advanceddementia are available but their use by physicians withdying patients has not been explored.Aims: To explore hospice, secondary and primary carephysicians’ use of pain assessment tools with patientsdying with advanced dementia.Methods: Twenty-three, semi-structured, face-to-facephysician interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim.Thematic analysis was applied to identify corethemes across healthcare settings. Three researchers verifiedfinal themes.Results: Four key themes emerged: non-use of painassessment tools; perceived limitations of tools; clinicaloutcomes of use and improving pain assessment. Physiciansdid not routinely use pain assessment tools withpatients dying with advanced dementia. Information fromphysical examination, physiological parameters andpatient observation in addition to collateral patient historyfrom families and nursing staff were perceived to providea more reliable and holistic approach to assessment andmanagement. Scoring subjectivity, proxy-reporting andoverreliance on nonverbal and behavioural cues were limitationsassociated with pain tools. Physicians perceived theclinical outcome of pain tool use to be quicker identificationand reporting of pain by nurses. Most physiciansbelieved pain assessment could be improved via betterintegration of secondary, hospice and primary care servicesin addition to ongoing medical education andmentoring.Conclusion: Physicians preferred clinical investigationand collateral patient history from family and other healthprofessionals to assess pain and guide management. Thesefindings have important implications for medical education,practice and health policy.Funding: HSC Research and Development Division, PublicHealth Agency, Northern Ireland.",
keywords = "Pain assessment, dementia, end of life, physician",
author = "{de Witt Jensen}, Banin and Kevin Brazil and Sonja McIlfatrick and {Passmore P}, Peter and Hilary Buchanan and Max Watson and {Parsons C}, Carole",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269216316646056",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "NP37--NP37",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
number = "6",

}

“A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life. / de Witt Jensen, Banin; Brazil, Kevin; McIlfatrick, Sonja; Passmore P, Peter; Buchanan, Hilary; Watson, Max; Parsons C, Carole.

In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 6, 01.06.2016, p. NP37-NP37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - “A Tool Doesn’t Add Anything” Physicians’ Perceptions and Use of Pain Assessment Tools with People with Advanced Dementia Approaching the End of Life

AU - de Witt Jensen, Banin

AU - Brazil, Kevin

AU - McIlfatrick, Sonja

AU - Passmore P, Peter

AU - Buchanan, Hilary

AU - Watson, Max

AU - Parsons C, Carole

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Background: People dying with advanced dementia areoften unable to effectively self-report pain and are at riskof under-assessment which may hinder pain diagnosis andmanagement. Pain assessment tools for use in advanceddementia are available but their use by physicians withdying patients has not been explored.Aims: To explore hospice, secondary and primary carephysicians’ use of pain assessment tools with patientsdying with advanced dementia.Methods: Twenty-three, semi-structured, face-to-facephysician interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim.Thematic analysis was applied to identify corethemes across healthcare settings. Three researchers verifiedfinal themes.Results: Four key themes emerged: non-use of painassessment tools; perceived limitations of tools; clinicaloutcomes of use and improving pain assessment. Physiciansdid not routinely use pain assessment tools withpatients dying with advanced dementia. Information fromphysical examination, physiological parameters andpatient observation in addition to collateral patient historyfrom families and nursing staff were perceived to providea more reliable and holistic approach to assessment andmanagement. Scoring subjectivity, proxy-reporting andoverreliance on nonverbal and behavioural cues were limitationsassociated with pain tools. Physicians perceived theclinical outcome of pain tool use to be quicker identificationand reporting of pain by nurses. Most physiciansbelieved pain assessment could be improved via betterintegration of secondary, hospice and primary care servicesin addition to ongoing medical education andmentoring.Conclusion: Physicians preferred clinical investigationand collateral patient history from family and other healthprofessionals to assess pain and guide management. Thesefindings have important implications for medical education,practice and health policy.Funding: HSC Research and Development Division, PublicHealth Agency, Northern Ireland.

AB - Background: People dying with advanced dementia areoften unable to effectively self-report pain and are at riskof under-assessment which may hinder pain diagnosis andmanagement. Pain assessment tools for use in advanceddementia are available but their use by physicians withdying patients has not been explored.Aims: To explore hospice, secondary and primary carephysicians’ use of pain assessment tools with patientsdying with advanced dementia.Methods: Twenty-three, semi-structured, face-to-facephysician interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim.Thematic analysis was applied to identify corethemes across healthcare settings. Three researchers verifiedfinal themes.Results: Four key themes emerged: non-use of painassessment tools; perceived limitations of tools; clinicaloutcomes of use and improving pain assessment. Physiciansdid not routinely use pain assessment tools withpatients dying with advanced dementia. Information fromphysical examination, physiological parameters andpatient observation in addition to collateral patient historyfrom families and nursing staff were perceived to providea more reliable and holistic approach to assessment andmanagement. Scoring subjectivity, proxy-reporting andoverreliance on nonverbal and behavioural cues were limitationsassociated with pain tools. Physicians perceived theclinical outcome of pain tool use to be quicker identificationand reporting of pain by nurses. Most physiciansbelieved pain assessment could be improved via betterintegration of secondary, hospice and primary care servicesin addition to ongoing medical education andmentoring.Conclusion: Physicians preferred clinical investigationand collateral patient history from family and other healthprofessionals to assess pain and guide management. Thesefindings have important implications for medical education,practice and health policy.Funding: HSC Research and Development Division, PublicHealth Agency, Northern Ireland.

KW - Pain assessment

KW - dementia

KW - end of life

KW - physician

U2 - 10.1177/0269216316646056

DO - 10.1177/0269216316646056

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - NP37-NP37

JO - Palliative Medicine

T2 - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 6

ER -