A Theory of Thinking: A Theory of Desiring

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article focuses on aspects of what is broadly known as countertransference in centering on the psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion’s explicit theory of thinking as constituting an implicit theory of desiring. I make a distinction between the discursive terms “thoughts,” “thinking,” “desires,” “desiring,” “wants,” and “craving” and tease out their relationship to one another for clinical practice. I explore how thinking and desiring operate in and around frustration and suggest that the thinking apparatus is not just a mechanism for dealing with thoughts but also is a way of transforming wants into desires. I separate out desires and the desiring apparatus, as Bion does with thoughts and thinking, and argue that thinking is inextricably linked to desiring and thoughts to desires. The interpretative act, moreover, constitutes the analyst’s acting on desire, whereas acts of projective identification are bound up with craving. I demonstrate the potential uses of this theory by discussing it with reference to two published clinical examples.
LanguageEnglish
Pages150-164
JournalStudies in Gender and Sexuality
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date25 Aug 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Aug 2016

Fingerprint

frustration

Keywords

  • Psychoanalysis
  • Psychosocial Studies
  • Wilfred Bion
  • thinking
  • desiring
  • clinical practice

Cite this

@article{fba8e922fdfb42cabe2a4d005da65aad,
title = "A Theory of Thinking: A Theory of Desiring",
abstract = "This article focuses on aspects of what is broadly known as countertransference in centering on the psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion’s explicit theory of thinking as constituting an implicit theory of desiring. I make a distinction between the discursive terms “thoughts,” “thinking,” “desires,” “desiring,” “wants,” and “craving” and tease out their relationship to one another for clinical practice. I explore how thinking and desiring operate in and around frustration and suggest that the thinking apparatus is not just a mechanism for dealing with thoughts but also is a way of transforming wants into desires. I separate out desires and the desiring apparatus, as Bion does with thoughts and thinking, and argue that thinking is inextricably linked to desiring and thoughts to desires. The interpretative act, moreover, constitutes the analyst’s acting on desire, whereas acts of projective identification are bound up with craving. I demonstrate the potential uses of this theory by discussing it with reference to two published clinical examples.",
keywords = "Psychoanalysis, Psychosocial Studies, Wilfred Bion, thinking, desiring, clinical practice",
author = "Noreen Giffney",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "25",
doi = "10.1080/15240657.2016.1199924",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "150--164",
journal = "Studies in Gender and Sexuality",
issn = "1524-0657",
number = "3",

}

A Theory of Thinking: A Theory of Desiring. / Giffney, Noreen.

In: Studies in Gender and Sexuality , Vol. 17, No. 3, 25.08.2016, p. 150-164.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Theory of Thinking: A Theory of Desiring

AU - Giffney, Noreen

PY - 2016/8/25

Y1 - 2016/8/25

N2 - This article focuses on aspects of what is broadly known as countertransference in centering on the psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion’s explicit theory of thinking as constituting an implicit theory of desiring. I make a distinction between the discursive terms “thoughts,” “thinking,” “desires,” “desiring,” “wants,” and “craving” and tease out their relationship to one another for clinical practice. I explore how thinking and desiring operate in and around frustration and suggest that the thinking apparatus is not just a mechanism for dealing with thoughts but also is a way of transforming wants into desires. I separate out desires and the desiring apparatus, as Bion does with thoughts and thinking, and argue that thinking is inextricably linked to desiring and thoughts to desires. The interpretative act, moreover, constitutes the analyst’s acting on desire, whereas acts of projective identification are bound up with craving. I demonstrate the potential uses of this theory by discussing it with reference to two published clinical examples.

AB - This article focuses on aspects of what is broadly known as countertransference in centering on the psychoanalyst Wilfred Bion’s explicit theory of thinking as constituting an implicit theory of desiring. I make a distinction between the discursive terms “thoughts,” “thinking,” “desires,” “desiring,” “wants,” and “craving” and tease out their relationship to one another for clinical practice. I explore how thinking and desiring operate in and around frustration and suggest that the thinking apparatus is not just a mechanism for dealing with thoughts but also is a way of transforming wants into desires. I separate out desires and the desiring apparatus, as Bion does with thoughts and thinking, and argue that thinking is inextricably linked to desiring and thoughts to desires. The interpretative act, moreover, constitutes the analyst’s acting on desire, whereas acts of projective identification are bound up with craving. I demonstrate the potential uses of this theory by discussing it with reference to two published clinical examples.

KW - Psychoanalysis

KW - Psychosocial Studies

KW - Wilfred Bion

KW - thinking

KW - desiring

KW - clinical practice

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15240657.2016.1199924?journalCode=hsgs20

U2 - 10.1080/15240657.2016.1199924

DO - 10.1080/15240657.2016.1199924

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 150

EP - 164

JO - Studies in Gender and Sexuality

T2 - Studies in Gender and Sexuality

JF - Studies in Gender and Sexuality

SN - 1524-0657

IS - 3

ER -