Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Abstract

Introduction: Health care systems have failed to address the poor physical health outcomes of people living with severe mental illness. Interventions that focus on specific health behaviours and/or lack a co-design basis show little promise. There is a need for whole systems approaches that tackle the complex issues, including social isolation, discrimination, stigma, and low motivation, that influence poor health in this population. A social prescribing model that accommodates the needs and preferences may be a way forward.
Methods: A mixed methods approach that assesses the CHOICE model (Challenging Health Outcomes Integrating Care Environments) in relation to (a) the social exclusion, loneliness and social support of a cohort of people living in the community; (b) participants’ experience of social prescribing and potential improvements to the intervention; (c) understanding the implementation factors, mechanisms and outcomes; (d) the engagement and sustainment of community partnerships; (e) institutional changes in policy and practice.
Discussion: Codesigned and community-based participatory interventions may be crucial in tackling the health
and social inequalities experienced by people with severe mental illness. However, given the complexity of such interventions, the social prescribing model that we describe in this paper, requires considerable implementation data prior to a full trial.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3211
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMC Public Health
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date30 Sept 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 30 Sept 2025
EventCHOICE Research Project: Challenging Health Outcomes/ Integrating Care Environments: A Consortium to Tackle Health Disparities for People Living with Mental Illness - Belfast
Duration: 7 Nov 202231 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Crown 2025.

Data Availability Statement

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Funding

The CHOICE project is funded by the Arts & Humanities Research Council (United Kingdom Research Institute) through 2 grants (Phase 1 & 2) AH/X005852/1 and AH/Z505420/1 respectively. Clinical trial number: not applicable.

FundersFunder number
Arts and Humanities Research CouncilAH/X005852/1, AH/Z505420/1

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
    2. SDG 10 - Reduced Inequalities
      SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
    3. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    4. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
      SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

    Keywords

    • Social Prescribing
    • Severe Mental Illness
    • Social Exclusion
    • Community Assets
    • Severe mental illness
    • Social prescribing
    • Social exclusion
    • Community assets
    • Health Status Disparities
    • Humans
    • Social Support
    • Mental Disorders/therapy
    • Social Isolation
    • Mental Disorders

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A social prescribing model for tackling the health and social inequalities of people living with severe mental illness: A protocol paper'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this