Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A rights-based critique of the Turkish mental healthcare reform: deinstitutionalisation without independent living?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of the 2006 Turkish mental healthcare reform aimed at deinstitutionalisation and introduction of a community-based approach. Combined with Turkey’s ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the rhetoric of the reform signified a step towards a rights-based approach. Despite some evidence of progress towards deinstitutionalisation, this article suggests that the reform has largely failed in its goal of implementing a rights-based approach, for three reasons: its inability to address unmet needs for mental healthcare, its failure to complement community-based mental healthcare provision with social policy programmes, and its deficiency in legislating civil rights protections. These failures have engendered an ineffective trend towards deinstitutionalisation rather than facilitating the transition to independent living. Finally, this article calls for a nuanced understanding of deinstitutionalisation, with consideration of the broader social policy and civil rights environment within which the mental healthcare system is embedded.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)933-954
Number of pages22
JournalDisability & Society
Volume37
Issue number6
Early online date28 Dec 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 3 Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Community-based mental healthcare
  • deinstitutionalisation
  • independent living
  • mental healthcare reform
  • social policy
  • Turkey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A rights-based critique of the Turkish mental healthcare reform: deinstitutionalisation without independent living?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this