A New argument for the Likelihood Ratio Measure of Confirmation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a new argument for the likelihood ratio measure of confirmation by showing that one of the adequacy criteria used in another argument (Zalabardo 2009) can be replaced by a more plausible and better supported criterion which is a special case of the weak likelihood principle. This new argument is also used to show that the likelihood ratio measure is also to be preferred not to a measure that has recently received support in the literature.
LanguageEnglish
Pages59-65
JournalActa Analytica
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Likelihood Ratio
Adequacy

Keywords

  • confirmation
  • evidential support
  • inductive support
  • likelihood ratio

Cite this

@article{72ca2ef6df634fd9a6b5658b2457cdf3,
title = "A New argument for the Likelihood Ratio Measure of Confirmation",
abstract = "This paper presents a new argument for the likelihood ratio measure of confirmation by showing that one of the adequacy criteria used in another argument (Zalabardo 2009) can be replaced by a more plausible and better supported criterion which is a special case of the weak likelihood principle. This new argument is also used to show that the likelihood ratio measure is also to be preferred not to a measure that has recently received support in the literature.",
keywords = "confirmation, evidential support, inductive support, likelihood ratio",
author = "DH Glass and M McCartney",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s12136-014-0228-6",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "59--65",
journal = "Acta Analytica",
issn = "0353-5150",
number = "1",

}

A New argument for the Likelihood Ratio Measure of Confirmation. / Glass, DH; McCartney, M.

In: Acta Analytica, Vol. 30, No. 1, 03.2015, p. 59-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New argument for the Likelihood Ratio Measure of Confirmation

AU - Glass, DH

AU - McCartney, M

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - This paper presents a new argument for the likelihood ratio measure of confirmation by showing that one of the adequacy criteria used in another argument (Zalabardo 2009) can be replaced by a more plausible and better supported criterion which is a special case of the weak likelihood principle. This new argument is also used to show that the likelihood ratio measure is also to be preferred not to a measure that has recently received support in the literature.

AB - This paper presents a new argument for the likelihood ratio measure of confirmation by showing that one of the adequacy criteria used in another argument (Zalabardo 2009) can be replaced by a more plausible and better supported criterion which is a special case of the weak likelihood principle. This new argument is also used to show that the likelihood ratio measure is also to be preferred not to a measure that has recently received support in the literature.

KW - confirmation

KW - evidential support

KW - inductive support

KW - likelihood ratio

U2 - 10.1007/s12136-014-0228-6

DO - 10.1007/s12136-014-0228-6

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 59

EP - 65

JO - Acta Analytica

T2 - Acta Analytica

JF - Acta Analytica

SN - 0353-5150

IS - 1

ER -