A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking

Nicholas D. Gilson, Barbara Ainsworth, Stuart Biddle, Guy Faulkner, Marie Murphy, Ailsa Niven, Andy Pringle, Anna Puig-Ribera, Afroditi Stathi, M. Renée Umstattd

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This paper aimed to use theDelphi technique to develop a consensusframework for a multinational, workplacewalking intervention. Methods: Ideas weregathered and ranked from eight recognized andemerging experts in the fields of physical activityand health, from universities in Australia,Canada, England, the Netherlands, NorthernIreland, and Spain. Members of the panel wereasked to consider the key characteristics of asuccessful campus walking intervention. Consensuswas reached by an inductive, contentanalytic approach, conducted through an anonymous,three-round, e-mail process. Results:The resulting framework consisted of threeinterlinking themes defined as “design, implementation,and evaluation.” Top-ranked subitemsin these themes included the need to generateresearch capacity (design), to respond togroup needs through different walkingapproaches (implementation), and to undertakephysical activity assessment (evaluation).Themes were set within an underpinningdomain, referred to as the “institution” andsites are currently engaging with subitems inthis domain, to provide sustainable interventionsthat reflect the practicalities of local contextsand needs. Conclusions: Findings providea unique framework for designing,implementing, and evaluating walking projectsin universities and highlight the value of adoptingthe Delphi technique for planning international,multisite health initiatives.
LanguageEnglish
Pages21-23
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Workplace
Walking
Delphi Technique
Health
Postal Service
England
Netherlands
Spain
Canada

Cite this

Gilson, N. D., Ainsworth, B., Biddle, S., Faulkner, G., Murphy, M., Niven, A., ... Umstattd, M. R. (2009). A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. Preventive Medicine, 49(1), 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001
Gilson, Nicholas D. ; Ainsworth, Barbara ; Biddle, Stuart ; Faulkner, Guy ; Murphy, Marie ; Niven, Ailsa ; Pringle, Andy ; Puig-Ribera, Anna ; Stathi, Afroditi ; Umstattd, M. Renée. / A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. In: Preventive Medicine. 2009 ; Vol. 49, No. 1. pp. 21-23.
@article{aa65c19f0f2a4ebe9db3df2fcf35eeb4,
title = "A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking",
abstract = "Background: This paper aimed to use theDelphi technique to develop a consensusframework for a multinational, workplacewalking intervention. Methods: Ideas weregathered and ranked from eight recognized andemerging experts in the fields of physical activityand health, from universities in Australia,Canada, England, the Netherlands, NorthernIreland, and Spain. Members of the panel wereasked to consider the key characteristics of asuccessful campus walking intervention. Consensuswas reached by an inductive, contentanalytic approach, conducted through an anonymous,three-round, e-mail process. Results:The resulting framework consisted of threeinterlinking themes defined as “design, implementation,and evaluation.” Top-ranked subitemsin these themes included the need to generateresearch capacity (design), to respond togroup needs through different walkingapproaches (implementation), and to undertakephysical activity assessment (evaluation).Themes were set within an underpinningdomain, referred to as the “institution” andsites are currently engaging with subitems inthis domain, to provide sustainable interventionsthat reflect the practicalities of local contextsand needs. Conclusions: Findings providea unique framework for designing,implementing, and evaluating walking projectsin universities and highlight the value of adoptingthe Delphi technique for planning international,multisite health initiatives.",
author = "Gilson, {Nicholas D.} and Barbara Ainsworth and Stuart Biddle and Guy Faulkner and Marie Murphy and Ailsa Niven and Andy Pringle and Anna Puig-Ribera and Afroditi Stathi and Umstattd, {M. Ren{\'e}e}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "21--23",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Gilson, ND, Ainsworth, B, Biddle, S, Faulkner, G, Murphy, M, Niven, A, Pringle, A, Puig-Ribera, A, Stathi, A & Umstattd, MR 2009, 'A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking', Preventive Medicine, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 21-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking. / Gilson, Nicholas D.; Ainsworth, Barbara; Biddle, Stuart; Faulkner, Guy; Murphy, Marie; Niven, Ailsa; Pringle, Andy; Puig-Ribera, Anna; Stathi, Afroditi; Umstattd, M. Renée.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2009, p. 21-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-site comparison of environmental characteristics to support workplace walking

AU - Gilson, Nicholas D.

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

AU - Biddle, Stuart

AU - Faulkner, Guy

AU - Murphy, Marie

AU - Niven, Ailsa

AU - Pringle, Andy

AU - Puig-Ribera, Anna

AU - Stathi, Afroditi

AU - Umstattd, M. Renée

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: This paper aimed to use theDelphi technique to develop a consensusframework for a multinational, workplacewalking intervention. Methods: Ideas weregathered and ranked from eight recognized andemerging experts in the fields of physical activityand health, from universities in Australia,Canada, England, the Netherlands, NorthernIreland, and Spain. Members of the panel wereasked to consider the key characteristics of asuccessful campus walking intervention. Consensuswas reached by an inductive, contentanalytic approach, conducted through an anonymous,three-round, e-mail process. Results:The resulting framework consisted of threeinterlinking themes defined as “design, implementation,and evaluation.” Top-ranked subitemsin these themes included the need to generateresearch capacity (design), to respond togroup needs through different walkingapproaches (implementation), and to undertakephysical activity assessment (evaluation).Themes were set within an underpinningdomain, referred to as the “institution” andsites are currently engaging with subitems inthis domain, to provide sustainable interventionsthat reflect the practicalities of local contextsand needs. Conclusions: Findings providea unique framework for designing,implementing, and evaluating walking projectsin universities and highlight the value of adoptingthe Delphi technique for planning international,multisite health initiatives.

AB - Background: This paper aimed to use theDelphi technique to develop a consensusframework for a multinational, workplacewalking intervention. Methods: Ideas weregathered and ranked from eight recognized andemerging experts in the fields of physical activityand health, from universities in Australia,Canada, England, the Netherlands, NorthernIreland, and Spain. Members of the panel wereasked to consider the key characteristics of asuccessful campus walking intervention. Consensuswas reached by an inductive, contentanalytic approach, conducted through an anonymous,three-round, e-mail process. Results:The resulting framework consisted of threeinterlinking themes defined as “design, implementation,and evaluation.” Top-ranked subitemsin these themes included the need to generateresearch capacity (design), to respond togroup needs through different walkingapproaches (implementation), and to undertakephysical activity assessment (evaluation).Themes were set within an underpinningdomain, referred to as the “institution” andsites are currently engaging with subitems inthis domain, to provide sustainable interventionsthat reflect the practicalities of local contextsand needs. Conclusions: Findings providea unique framework for designing,implementing, and evaluating walking projectsin universities and highlight the value of adoptingthe Delphi technique for planning international,multisite health initiatives.

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.05.001

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 21

EP - 23

JO - Preventive Medicine

T2 - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

IS - 1

ER -