Abstract
Introduction
The issue of occupational therapy’s professional identity has been debated for many years and continues today. Lack of clarity has resulted in occupational therapists’ perceptions of holding a low status and of colleague and public misunderstanding.
Method
A range of international literature was reviewed. Inductive analysis elicited two major themes – reasons for issues with identity and the consequences of issues with identity. The development of communities of practice is discussed.
Results
The analysis of the causes and consequences of issues with professional identity was used to suggest how the profession might become a mature community of practice. Lack of deep knowledge of the profession’s unique beliefs was shown to cause inconsistent messages about its identity. Consequently, practitioners believed they were undervalued. Understanding, owning and reinforcing an occupational paradigm were seen as vital elements for creating professional communities of practice.
Conclusion
To function as a community of practice requires occupational therapists to use a range of strategies that reinforce their unique occupation-based practice. Where all members commit to a single set of values and beliefs this can afford a unique identity, reinforced by the ability to demonstrate and articulate this through a clear, single message.
The issue of occupational therapy’s professional identity has been debated for many years and continues today. Lack of clarity has resulted in occupational therapists’ perceptions of holding a low status and of colleague and public misunderstanding.
Method
A range of international literature was reviewed. Inductive analysis elicited two major themes – reasons for issues with identity and the consequences of issues with identity. The development of communities of practice is discussed.
Results
The analysis of the causes and consequences of issues with professional identity was used to suggest how the profession might become a mature community of practice. Lack of deep knowledge of the profession’s unique beliefs was shown to cause inconsistent messages about its identity. Consequently, practitioners believed they were undervalued. Understanding, owning and reinforcing an occupational paradigm were seen as vital elements for creating professional communities of practice.
Conclusion
To function as a community of practice requires occupational therapists to use a range of strategies that reinforce their unique occupation-based practice. Where all members commit to a single set of values and beliefs this can afford a unique identity, reinforced by the ability to demonstrate and articulate this through a clear, single message.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 664-673 |
| Journal | British Journal of Occupational Therapy |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 21 Nov 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A debate on the professional identity of occupational therapists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Student theses
-
Professional identity in occupational therapy
Turner, E. A. (Author), Kerr, D. (Supervisor), Hannon-Fletcher, M. (Supervisor) & McClure, P. (Supervisor), Apr 2018Student thesis: Doctoral Thesis
File
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver