Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparison of in-patient mental health rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector in England: patient and service characteristics

  • Helen Killaspy
  • , Christian Dalton-Locke
  • , Mariam Adeleke
  • , Nia Barber
  • , Bella Branch
  • , Caroline Sarah Clarke
  • , Gerard Leavey
  • , Artemis Igoumenou
  • , Katherine Barrett
  • , Megan Downey
  • , Sophie Thomas
  • , Jing Yi (Jessica) Weng
  • , Rumana Z. Omar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background In-patient mental health rehabilitation services provide specialist care to adults with complex psychosis. In England, there are more than 350 such services, half provided by the National Health Service (NHS) and half by the independent sector. Aims To investigate whether NHS and independent sector in-patient mental health rehabilitation services differ. Method We recruited a random sample of NHS and independent sector services across England. We collected cross-sectional data regarding service and patient characteristics through interviews with patients, clinicians and managers, and from healthcare record reviews. Results We recruited 411 patients from 48 NHS services and 172 patients from 20 independent sector services. Service characteristics, including standardised quality scores, were similar. Most patients had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (NHS n = 237, 57.7%; independent sector n = 99, 57.6%) or schizoaffective disorder (NHS n = 88, 21.4%; independent sector n = 32, 18.6%). More than half had at least one comorbid condition, but more independent sector patients had at least two (NHS 131 of 411, 31.9%; independent sector 80 of 172, 46.5%; P = 0.001). Current admissions were twice as long for independent sector patients (NHS mean 1.2 years [s.d. 1.5]; independent sector mean 2.4 years [s.d. 2.8]). Standardised ratings of patients' quality of life, autonomy, time use, satisfaction with care, social and everyday functioning, and challenging behaviours were similar. However, independent sector patients had more needs (NHS mean 6.5 [s.d. 3.2]; independent sector mean 7.9 [s.d. 3.9]; P < 0.001) and more had a history of fire setting (NHS 32, 7.9%; independent sector 28, 17.2%; P = 0.001). Conclusions Both NHS and independent sector in-patient rehabilitation services support people with complex psychosis, but independent sector patients may have more complex conditions, which could explain their longer admissions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere196
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalBJPsych Open
Volume12
Issue number4
Early online date24 Jul 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 24 Jul 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2026.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, H.K., upon reasonable request.

Funding

This study/project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (HSDR(NIHR130693)). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health and Care Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Funder number
HSDR (NIHR130693)

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • In-patient treatment
    • mental health rehabilittion
    • NHS
    • independent sector
    • complex psychosis
    • mental health rehabilitation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of in-patient mental health rehabilitation services provided by the NHS and independent sector in England: patient and service characteristics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this