Abstract
The widespread manipulation of digital images on social media has significantly undermined public trust in visual content and created major challenges for automated forgery detection. These challenges are further intensified by platform-induced degradations such as compression, resizing, and filtering, which often obscure forensic traces. This work develops FIDD-6000, a large-scale benchmark dataset for image forgery detection and localization, containing 6000 social media images, including 1000 authentic and 5000 manipulated samples, with pixel-level ground-truth masks annotated across three forgery categories, splicing, copy-move, and retouching, all created under realistic post-processing conditions. Each manipulated image is accompanied by a pixel-level ground-truth mask indicating the tampered regions. To assess the challenges posed by social media-based image manipulation, we evaluate 15 state-of-the-art image forgery localization methods on FIDD-6000, including approaches based on JPEG compression artifacts, sensor-noise analysis, and error level analysis. Experimental results show that these methods perform poorly on the proposed dataset, revealing their limited effectiveness in detecting forged images that have undergone social media-specific compression and transformation. This performance gap highlights the need for more robust and advanced machine learning and deep learning approaches capable of handling the complexity of modern image manipulations. Therefore, FIDD-6000 provides a valuable resource for researchers by offering a rigorous benchmark for developing, evaluating, and comparing next-generation forgery detection and localization methods.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 40 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-34 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 19 May 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Jun 2026 |
Bibliographical note
©2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.Data Availability Statement
We plan to make the FIDD-6000 dataset publicly available for research purposes through the following link: https://github.com/Mehedicse11/FIDD-6000 (accessed on: 17 March 2026). Giventhatasubstantial portion of the images was sourced fromsocial media, privacy and copyright issues must be carefully considered. To mitigate these concerns, we have ensured that all images are either: (i) already in the public domain through fact-checking reports and open media archives or (ii) used under the principles of fair use for academic research, particularly in cases where the manipulatedcontenthasbeenwidelycirculatedinnewsorsocialmediaaspartofpublicdiscourse. Nevertheless, users of FIDD-6000 are advised to handle the dataset responsibly and ethically, as some images may contain identifiable individuals or be associated with sensitive sociopolitical contexts. Additionally, the motive annotations (e.g., propaganda, satire, and misinformation) in the dataset are based on the best available evidence from fact-checking sources. While we have aimed for accuracy and transparency, we acknowledge that such categorizations may involve a degree of subjectivity and maynot be universally agreed upon. These annotations are provided to enhance reproducibility and encourage critical engagement while maintaining transparency about their interpretive nature. Takedown Process: A takedown process is in place for any content that is found to be in violation of copyright or privacy rights. Requests for takedown will be handled promptly upon notification. De-Identification/Redaction Policy: We ensure that any identifiable information about individuals in the images is either redacted or de-identified before the release of the dataset. Users are strongly encouraged to handle the dataset in compliance with privacy and ethical guidelines.Funding
This research study was supported by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Division of the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh through the award of an ICT Fellowship (Reference No. 56.00.0000.052.33.001.23-57).
| Funder number |
|---|
| 56.00.0000.052.33.001.23-57 |
Keywords
- image manipulation
- fake image
- forgery
- image localization
- forgery detection
- social media
- image forgery
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Benchmark for Image Forgery Detection and Localization on Social Media Images'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver