Evaluation of the options re. Brexit negotiations and "deal"

Press/Media: Expert Comment

Description

Consider 3 options: the Draft Withdrawal Agreement, leaving without a deal (WTO etc.) and a so-called "third way" i.e. further negotiations

Subject

Copy of the article, Three scenarios relating to the Brexit negotiations

 

Dr Esmond Birnie, Senior Economist Ulster Business School

 

The American sports commentator Yogi Berra once said prediction is difficult because it is about the future. Bearing that in mind, and the perceived failures of economic forecasters, here are considerations relating to three possible scenarios:

 

The draft Withdrawal Agreement (DWA) is accepted

 

The reason why a number of business organisations have indicated willingness to accept the deal is the advantages they perceive. Notably:

 

  • Comprehensive “legal cover” for leaving EU, which keeps the Eurostar running, UK drivers’ licenses in EU, over-flights by planes etc. etc.

  • Allows for a transition period- 30 March 2018-31 Dec. 2019. The UK, in effect, remains under all the EU rules for a bit longer. We have more time to prepare for the exit.

  • In transition and, indeed, in any operation of the back-stop Northern Ireland plus GB remain in the EU’s customs arrangements. Northern Ireland remains in the Single Market.

     

    Nevertheless, the DWA is likely to be associated with a range of disadvantages, some of which are broader in scope. Some relate to the long term as opposed to the short term:

     

  • UK continues to pay its dues to EU until transition period is over: at least £39bn.

  • Could the UK ever exit from the customs union type arrangements?

  • And if it could leave, the EU might oblige it to “leave behind” Northern Ireland which would then face tariff barriers relative to GB.

  • Checks on GB-to-Northern Ireland sales, which amount to about £11bn annually, to ensure compliance with EU Single Market regulations. Could that mean higher costs for grocery imports? Note that our “imports” from GB are several times higher than those coming from the Republic plus rest of the EU.

  • Northern Ireland could become a passive rule-taker, would that promote improvements in competitiveness and productivity?

  • The UK in general, but Northern Ireland especially, would be unable to use Brexit as springboard for global free trade agreements.

     

    In fact, the DWA taken together with Sunday’s 26 page political declaration leaves some important issues requiring resolution in future negotiations:

     

  • How to avoid the Irish hard border if the UK wants to leave the Customs Union?

  • Much much access will EU fishing boats get to UK waters?

  • How far would the UK be allowed to seek competitiveness through deviating from EU regulations (allied to the question of how far in practice the UK would still be subject to the European Court of Justice)?

 

 

 

No overall agreement, World Trade Organisation and other default arrangements

 

The impression is sometimes given that this would be the same as being cut off from continental Europe/the Republic through blockade or quarantine. In reality, it is a lot drastic than that. Most countries around the world are not members of the EU and most of those non-European countries do trade with the EU, some very successfully.

 

In the case of Brexit the more realistic fear relates to the incremental effect on trade through increased frictions. The UK would be liable to pay the EU’s tariff on any exports into the EU- for most manufactured goods that tax is quite small though tariffs on food products are higher. It remains to be seen how far a series of small scale holding agreements could be put in place to maintain easy economic flows across the frontiers.

 

A third way, renewed negotiations

 

The logic here is that the DWA has left some Brexiters and Remainers feeling very unsatisfied. So, why not go back to Brussels and ask (demand?) more? But, would any such approach receive a favourable response? The stated position of the Commissions and European leaders is “thus far and no further”. It could be that UK negotiators would get more if, for the first time, they indicated they were willing to accept a “no deal” in preference to what the EU has offered. A third way becomes more viable if both the UK and the EU27 are willing to prolong the withdrawal process in the sense of pushing back the 29 March 2019 deadline. Technological solutions to the Irish border come more feasible over a longer period of time

 

Period27 Nov 2018

Media contributions

1

Media contributions

  • TitleForecasting three possible scenarios to future of Brexit
    Media name/outletBelfast Telegraph
    CountryUnited Kingdom
    Date27/11/18
    DescriptionBelfast Telegraph (Business) article
    PersonsEsmond Birnie